Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merging to master. Thanks for your patience!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73248/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73248/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73244/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73244/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73245/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73245/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73248/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Updated the PR. Thanks for the work you've done on this! Hopefully I can
have a PR for the builder interface up later this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73245/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Two final comments. Then I'll merge it pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73244/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Missed updating a test, my mistake. Fixing now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73240/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73240/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz I've updated the PR per your feedback. ```BasicAWSCredentials```
will raise a ```java.lang.IllegalArgumentException``` if either keypair value
is null so I elected to wrap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73240/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz I actually think that Scaladoc may be outdatedâ I double checked
the current master branch and it looks like ```KinesisUtils.createStream()```
will still provide
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde The scaladocs mention
```
* @param awsAccessKeyId AWS AccessKeyId (if null, will use
DefaultAWSCredentialsProviderChain)
* @param awsSecretKey AWS SecretKey (if null, will use
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
So, if these values are ```null``` we'll still be passing them to construct
a ```BasicCredentialsProvider``` to pass as
```STSCredentialsProvider.longLivedCredentialsProvider```. I could add a check
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Can't they still use `null` to use the `DefaultProviderChain`? It's still
supported, right? We're only forcing them to provide a `messageHandler`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz I share your concerns around expanding this API further than
necessary. I think I'm okay with this as long as we're fairly confident the
builder pattern work can be merged in the same Spark
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde I'm just concerned by the exponential blowoff of APIs. Here's my
proposal.
For both Java and Scala, let's just add the APIs with both STS token and
AWS Key pair defined versions. I'm
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Anyone I can ping to help get this merged? The PR is going on a
month old at this point and I know that lack of STS support is an issue that
several interested parties would like to see get
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Yes, it can be merged as-is. I would create a JIRA for the builder
interface, and start working on it simultaneously.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Just for clarification, can this PR be merged as-is with a separate
Jira/PR for adding a builder interface or is the builder interface a
prerequisite for merging this?
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73090/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73090 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73090/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #73090 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73090/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Please do. I'd like to get this merged soon, because it's a useful PR. I'll
try to take one more look today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Fair enough. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help get
this merged. I can also take a look at adding a builder class for Kinesis
streams as a separate PR before the code freeze.
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde Since this PR adds new functionalities, I'm inclined to not backport
it since Spark Streaming APIs are considered stable, and this PR adds a lot of
new APIs which is weird for a maintenance
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz, @zsxwing â Any update here? Worried that this PR is starting to
languish.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Any thoughts on moving the dependency version bump to a new commit
and backporting to 2.11 with the pervious versions?
@zswing Any chance you could take a look at this sometime this
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Would it be possible to backport to 2.1.1 if I reverted to the old
version of the KCL and made the dependency upgrade as a separate PR? We'd still
be adding ```aws-java-sdk-sts``` as a
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde This looks good to me, but I've asked @zsxwing to also take a look
with a clean set of eyes. We can't backport this to 2.1.1, because of the
dependency changes. I'm also wondering if there
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72656/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72656/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72656/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@budde You should be whitelisted now. you may use "retest this please" to
trigger tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Pinging @brkyvz and @srowen once more for a final look and to get Jenkins
to retest the latest update (not sure if this still requires Jenkins admin
rights).
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Looks like Jenkins is failing to build any recent PR due to the following
error:
```[error] Could not find hadoop2.3 in the list. Valid options are
['hadoop2.6', 'hadoop2.7']```
I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending the PR again to fix new dependency conflict in spark/pom.xml.
Thanks again for taking the time to review this, @brkyvz and @srowen. Please
let me know if you feel any additional changes are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72533/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72533 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72533/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72532/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72532/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72533 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72533/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending PR per review feedback. Issue around using optional stsExternalId
argument in ```KinesisUtils.createStream()``` remains open.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72532/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72481/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72481 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72481/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72480 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72481/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
PR has been amended to reflect feedback. Thanks for taking a look, @brkyvz.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Hi @budde, taking a look at this now. Sorry for the wait
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending this PR to upgrade the KCL/AWS SDK dependencies to more-current
versions (1.7.3 and 1.11.76, respectively). The
```RegionUtils.getRegionByEndpoint()``` API was removed from the SDK, so I've
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Pinging @brkyvz as well, who also appears to have reviewed kinesis-asl
changes in the past
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
There shouldn't be any change to behavior or compatibility when using the
existing implementations of ```KinesisUtils.createStream()```. Only drawback I
can think of is this is making the
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Pinging @zsxwing and @srowen, additional committers who have previously
reviewed kinesis-asl changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Pinging @tdas on this-- looks like you're the committer who has contributed
the most to kinesis-asl.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72175/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72175/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Also, on another note, the ```SerializableKCLAuthProvider``` class that
**SparkQA** is identifying as a new public class is actually package private
and replaced another package private class
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
The JIRA I opended for this issue contains further details and background.
Linking to it here for good measure:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19405
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72175 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72175/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Missed the code in python/streaming that this touches. Will update PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72165/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72165/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72164/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72164/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72164/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72163/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72163/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72163/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
100 matches
Mail list logo
