Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
cc @jinxing64 @hvanhovell @MaxGekk
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #95773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95773/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #95773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95773/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94929/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94929/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94929/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94910/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94910/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94910/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
@MaxGekk In the updated message, I left out "hash" from the term "hash
relation" only because it seems the relation could be also be an Array.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94907/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #94907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94907/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
lgtm, just a small reword in one of the msgs suggested by maxgekk.
@hvanhovell @gatorsmile would you like to review this as well?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93703/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #93703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93703/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #93703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93703/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
>Is it possible to include the actual size of the in-memory table so far in
the msg as well?
Only if the relation can be built. If we run out of memory attempting to
build the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93687/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #93687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93687/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
> Is it possible to include the actual size of the in-memory table so far
in the msg as well?
Possibly. The state of the relation might be messy when I go to query its
size.
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
this looks good -- wondering about a couple of potential improvements. Is
it possible to include the actual size of the in-memory table so far in the msg
as well?
Also, does catching the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21899
**[Test build #93687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93687/testReport)**
for PR 21899 at commit
34 matches
Mail list logo
