Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #97865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97865/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #97828 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97828/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #97845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/97845/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
@cloud-fan @rdblue
I want to leave some comments and thoughts during looking into this again,
hope these can help us deciding the next step plan.
Currently all the plan assumed input
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Got it, I'll revert the changes in file source in this commit, thanks for
your reply.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
can we do it for data source v2 first? It seems hard to fix the file
source, as its reader function may lie about the return type.
Let's see what's the simplest fix to remove the hack for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95422/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95422/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95422/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
@cloud-fan Thanks for your reply Wenchen, I'm trying to achieve this in
this commit, please take a look, thanks.
---
-
To
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
+1 on @rdblue 's idea. One point is, we should use
`ColumnarBatchScan.supportsBatch` to indicate columnar scan or not, instead of
asking the RDD to report it.
---
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
@xuanyuanking, while this does remove the hack, it doesn't address the
underlying problem. The problem is that there is a single RDD, which may
contain InternalRow or may contain ColumnarBatch.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95261/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95261 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95261/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95261/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
cc @cloud-fan and @rdblue have a look when you have time. If this PR
doesn't coincide with your expect, I'll close this soon. Thanks!
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95217/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95217/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
**[Test build #95217 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/95217/testReport)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
28 matches
Mail list logo
