Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r28363963
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDCheckpointData.scala
---
@@ -92,8 +92,13 @@ private[spark] class RDDCheckpointData[T:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-93040724
Merging this into master thanks @witgo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-78057557
[Test build #28430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28430/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-78075491
[Test build #28430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28430/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-78075511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76114183
@andrewor14 @tdas The code has been updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76114203
[Test build #27975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27975/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76114680
[Test build #27976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27976/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76120081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76120505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76120498
[Test build #27976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27976/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-76120078
[Test build #27975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27975/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r25144332
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,6 +206,38 @@ class ContextCleanerSuite extends
ContextCleanerSuiteBase {
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-75490741
@andrewor14 Yes, this is a good feature to have.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-75153316
@witgo @tdas This seems like a good feature to have. However, the PR has
mostly gone stale at this point. Would you mind updating this to master? After
you do that I
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r25033376
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ private sealed trait CleanupTask
private case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61223905
[Test build #22601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22601/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61228046
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-61228040
[Test build #22601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22601/consoleFull)
for PR 855 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-54776809
@tdas this has gone stale - can you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50853335
QA tests have started for PR 855. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17654/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50853502
QA results for PR 855:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-5085
QA results for PR 855:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50870292
This is definitely better. Can you make add the documentation for this
property in the configuration page?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r15690169
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,6 +206,33 @@ class ContextCleanerSuite extends
ContextCleanerSuiteBase {
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r15690254
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,6 +206,33 @@ class ContextCleanerSuite extends
ContextCleanerSuiteBase {
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#discussion_r15690344
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleanerSuite.scala ---
@@ -206,6 +206,33 @@ class ContextCleanerSuite extends
ContextCleanerSuiteBase {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50891048
QA tests have started for PR 855. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17673/consoleFull
---
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50895949
This definitely is much better, thanks for the PR !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-50897414
QA results for PR 855:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-49192571
QA tests have started for PR 855. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16731/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/855#issuecomment-49205391
QA results for PR 855:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
33 matches
Mail list logo
