Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72810144
Thanks! I have merged this.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:30 PM, UCB AMPLab notificati...@github.com
wrote:
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72785026
Also could could update the python API as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72784927
Please add unit tests for this behavior! It should be in
StreamingContextSuite.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72796748
[Test build #26726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26726/consoleFull)
for PR 4171 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72797695
LGTM, will merge when tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72803094
[Test build #26726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26726/consoleFull)
for PR 4171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72803099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-71159820
[Test build #26002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26002/consoleFull)
for PR 4171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-71159823
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-71172693
Yeah, it seems good to propagate the `Boolean` return value from `waiter`
here, or else there's no way to distinguish timeout from non-timeout. And yes
it seems like it
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171
[SPARK-5379][Streaming] Add awaitTerminationOrTimeout
Added `awaitTerminationOrTimeout` to return if the waiting time elapsed:
* `true` if it's stopped.
* `false` if the waiting time elapsed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-71155123
[Test build #26002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26002/consoleFull)
for PR 4171 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-71154979
cc @tdas, @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
14 matches
Mail list logo
