Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-49193225
QA tests have started for PR 929. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16733/consoleFull
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-49206560
QA results for PR 929:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more
information see test
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-47180387
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-47180380
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-47182436
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16135/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-47182435
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45067410
I don't think checkpointing every 3 iterations is a good choice. Could you
try different values, e.g., 3 and 20, and check the running times? Also, it
doesn't solve the
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45069637
@mengxr
By calling this method `RDD.checkpoint`, `ContextCleaner` can clean up the
shuffle data, reduce disk usage.
Just as described in the table below.
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45070672
As for the above data. One iteration write `160G` shuffle data . Three
iterations will have occupied `480G` hard disk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45071297
@mengxr
Since I only have three test server, I need more time to test your ideas.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45073179
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45073488
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-45076638
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929
Improve ALS algorithm resource usage
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark improve_als
Alternatively you can review and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742009
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742011
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742189
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742193
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742668
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15317/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742667
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742949
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15318/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/929#issuecomment-44742948
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
22 matches
Mail list logo