---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44799/#review123482
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On March 14, 2016, 11:53 a.m., John Sirois wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44799/
> ---
>
> (Updated March 14, 2016, 11:53 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
>
>
> Repository: aurora-packaging
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This adjusts to fallout from https://reviews.apache.org/r/43936/ to get
> the centos-7 builder working again and improves the test docs to include
> both locally built rpm and released (or release candidate) rpm testing.
>
> This change also imporves the `release-candidate` script to be
> idempotent and handle missing binaries (ie: when only using a subset of
> builders).
>
> build-support/release/release-candidate | 33
> +
> specs/rpm/Makefile | 5 ++---
> specs/rpm/aurora.spec | 2 +-
> test/rpm/centos-7/README.md | 24 +---
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> build-support/release/release-candidate
> c21a0107043c76137daace8823dd28ac3c46957d
> specs/rpm/Makefile 0fa215854df9678adf7f9a1209dfca1cc4db8ce9
> specs/rpm/aurora.spec 20a6d349eb7cd6c801ddc7b149dd656f4a517cd1
> test/rpm/centos-7/README.md 6a6e419eae0b91608450d932139e515ff47c8445
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44799/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
> CentOS 7 test doc fixes rendered here:
> https://github.com/jsirois/aurora-packaging/tree/0.12.x/test/rpm/centos-7
>
> I exercised the `Makefile` and `aurora.spec` fixes to build a new batch of
> rpms and then used the improved `release-candidate` script to create the rpm
> `upload.tar` and update the 0.12.0 RC bintray repo here:
> https://bintray.com/john-sirois/aurora/centos-7/0.12.0
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Sirois
>
>