---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19313/#review38086
---
docs/README.md
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19313/#comment70051
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19519/#review38099
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On March 21, 2014, 2:48
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17818/#review38101
---
Jake - do you agree with discarding this in favor of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18537/
---
(Updated March 21, 2014, 2:59 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17293/#review38107
---
Looks like committers neglected to put this on master. It's now on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19207/#review38110
---
The summary and description don't seem to match the diff here. Can
On March 21, 2014, 2:52 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
Jake - do you agree with discarding this in favor of
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17750/?
Was waiting on Kevin to commit that and then was going to rebase the other
changes that I did for this against his https://reviews.apache.org/r/17750
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/#review38113
---
Ping, Bill?
- Maxim Khutornenko
On March 20, 2014, 12:20 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19362/#review38114
---
Ping.
- Maxim Khutornenko
On March 18, 2014, 6:16 p.m., Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19534/
---
Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
Repository: aurora
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/#review38123
---
Just to make things clear, this changelist is not addressing the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19411/
---
(Updated March 21, 2014, 2:21 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Maxim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19466/#review38140
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/context.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19509/#review38147
---
Just FYI: the client unit tests weren't intended to detect stuff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19509/#review38148
---
Please update the end-to-end test - it will cheaply and
No, this one got shipped a while back.
Tom
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Bill Farner wfar...@apache.org wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16630/
Is this review still relevant? If so, can you add some target reviewer
On March 21, 2014, 2:44 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_restart.py, line 43
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19466/diff/1/?file=529930#file529930line43
Right, my comment was about the method in this class that still uses
the old reference?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19396/#review38155
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/__init__.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19078/#review38159
---
Ship it!
src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_status.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19396/#review38160
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/__init__.py
On March 21, 2014, 6:44 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py, line 317
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19466/diff/1/?file=529926#file529926line317
I hear your point. However, it would be a departure from other places
where we use batching
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19431/#review38162
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/jobs.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16710/#review38166
---
you can pull me off this review as I think you have all bases
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19362/#review38167
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Wickman
On March 18, 2014, 6:16 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19411/#review38169
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Wickman
On March 21, 2014, 6:21 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/
---
(Updated March 21, 2014, 7:42 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19431/
---
(Updated March 21, 2014, 3:56 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19431/#review38196
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/options.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19396/#review38198
---
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/__init__.py
On March 21, 2014, 11:58 a.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/quota.py, line 71
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19509/diff/1/?file=531021#file531021line71
Maybe I just read weird stuff, but this wording is uncomfortable:
consumption is the historic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19550/
---
Review request for Aurora and Brian Wickman.
Bugs: AURORA-287
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19509/#review38205
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Chu-Carroll
On March 20, 2014, 10:39
On March 21, 2014, 6:27 p.m., Mark Chu-Carroll wrote:
Just FYI: the client unit tests weren't intended to detect stuff like this.
The intention of those tests is just to verify that the client logic works
- meaning that the client sends the API calls that we expect it to. If an
API
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19078/
---
(Updated March 21, 2014, 9:39 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19078/#review38232
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Farner
On March 21, 2014, 9:39 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19509/#review38235
---
src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/cli/test_quota.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/#review38237
---
Ship it!
On March 22, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskStateMachine.java, line
573
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/diff/2/?file=531757#file531757line573
return previousState.getStatus().orNull()
Ah, another good feature of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/#review38240
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19436/
---
(Updated March 22, 2014, 12:30 a.m.)
Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney
40 matches
Mail list logo
