---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25255/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 1:06 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25741/
---
Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Maxim Khutornenko.
Repository:
On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:21 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
Does removing an instance take any significant amount of time? Can it fail?
The concern is we'll be showing 100% progress but the update is still
running when reducing the instance count.
Bill Farner wrote:
Depends on your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25741/#review53708
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Maxim Khutornenko
On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25255/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 2:44 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25721/#review53733
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Cohen
On Sept. 17, 2014, 5:49 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 8:40 p.m.)
Review request for Aurora, David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25750/#review53746
---
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25753/#review53753
---
Ship it!
Other than the docs, lgtm.
- David McLaughlin
On Sept.
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
On Sept. 17, 2014, 9:18 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
+1 to the code change, UI stuff in particular looks good to me.
-1 to dropping instanceCount completely though. I thought we mentioned we
wanted to capture and store all the original details the user sends? Even
if this is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25760/#review53778
---
Ship it!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25760/#review53786
---
Ship it!
LGTM mod Maxim's comments.
- Bill Farner
On Sept. 18,
15 matches
Mail list logo
