> On April 3, 2016, 11:40 p.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > Why did you replace `AWAIT_ASSERT_EQ(true/false` only? Why not
> > `EQ(true/false` in general, so that we would catch the use of
> > `EXPECT_SOME_EQ(true, expr);` in `src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp` for
> > example?
> > Is there perhaps
> On April 3, 2016, 11:40 p.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > Why did you replace `AWAIT_ASSERT_EQ(true/false` only? Why not
> > `EQ(true/false` in general, so that we would catch the use of
> > `EXPECT_SOME_EQ(true, expr);` in `src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp` for
> > example?
> > Is there perhaps
> On April 3, 2016, 11:40 p.m., Michael Park wrote:
> > Why did you replace `AWAIT_ASSERT_EQ(true/false` only? Why not
> > `EQ(true/false` in general, so that we would catch the use of
> > `EXPECT_SOME_EQ(true, expr);` in `src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp` for
> > example?
> > Is there perhaps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45356/#review126762
---
Why did you replace `AWAIT_ASSERT_EQ(true/false` only? Why not `EQ
