> On 五月 13, 2016, 5:22 p.m., James Peach wrote:
> > Looks fine. Consider switching to ``unique_ptr``, since we only check the
> > ``fts_close`` error 1 of 3 times.
@James Peach, can you please show more detail for what do you mean? How to
switch to `unique_prt`? Do you want me to submit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47336/#review133205
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Gilbert Song
On May 13, 2016, 12:09
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47336/#review133158
---
Ship it!
Looks fine. Consider switching to ``unique_ptr``,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47336/#review133139
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Timothy Chen
On May 13, 2016, 7:09
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47336/#review133095
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [47336]
Passed command:
