---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/#review200790
---
PASS: Mesos patch 65940 was successfully built and tested.
Review
> On April 6, 2018, 12:25 a.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> > This looks good to me. I am wondering if we need more test coverage for
> > insertion/deletion of roles implicit roles. Perhaps a TODO?
Yes, I was considering adding unit-tests for the `RoleTrackingTree` itself,
that way we can avoid the hu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/#review200609
---
Ship it!
This looks good to me. I am wondering if we need more
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/#review200557
---
FAIL: Some of the unit tests failed. Please check the relevant log
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/
---
(Updated April 5, 2018, 4:15 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Bannier,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/#review198774
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [65939, 65940]
Passed comman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65940/#review198757
---
PASS: Mesos patch 65940 was successfully built and tested.
Review