---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205597
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
Thanks! Will get this committed shortly.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205565
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [67590]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205552
---
PASS: Mesos patch 67590 was successfully built and tested.
> On June 28, 2018, 2:04 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > Looks pretty good! The only thing that feels a little off is the size
> > parameterization. It currently represents the number of ranges, but I
> > imagine other benchmarks might not want to use that as the "size" (vs the
> > overall
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/
---
(Updated June 28, 2018, 5:38 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205531
---
PASS: Mesos patch 67590 was successfully built and tested.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205530
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [67590]
Passed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/#review205529
---
Fix it, then Ship it!
Looks pretty good! The only thing that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67590/
---
(Updated June 28, 2018, 12:34 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Benjamin
> On June 27, 2018, 6:29 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> > Great to see this!
> >
> > Can you update the testing done to say whether this was measured with an
> > optimized build? If not, can you add the optimized build measurements?
Updated numbers with optimized build
> On June 27, 2018,
10 matches
Mail list logo