Re: Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Marco Massenzio
> On June 16, 2015, 4:40 p.m., Marco Massenzio wrote: > > Beauty being in the eye of the beholder, I'm not entirely sure that I like > > the new version better (that is: assuming that the "new and improved" > > version is the bottom one?). > > > > Can you please make the description clearer by

Re: Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Ben Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35508/#review88101 --- Ship it! It looks like this was probably the original intent (doesn

Re: Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Alexander Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35508/ --- (Updated June 16, 2015, 6:58 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vin

Re: Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Alexander Rojas
> On June 16, 2015, 6:40 p.m., Marco Massenzio wrote: > > Beauty being in the eye of the beholder, I'm not entirely sure that I like > > the new version better (that is: assuming that the "new and improved" > > version is the bottom one?). > > > > Can you please make the description clearer by

Re: Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Marco Massenzio
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35508/#review88082 --- Beauty being in the eye of the beholder, I'm not entirely sure that

Review Request 35508: Improve readability in post-review

2015-06-16 Thread Alexander Rojas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35508/ --- Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone. Repository: mesos Descri