> On April 29, 2016, 9:29 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > It would be great to implement `CHECK_NREADY`, `CHECK_NDISCARDED`, then we
> > could have replaced `CHECK(!candidacy.isDiscarded());` for consistency. Do
> > you want to do it here or follow up with another patch?
>
> Neil Conway w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/#review131287
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alexander Rukletsov
On April 29, 2016, 2
> On April 29, 2016, 9:29 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > It would be great to implement `CHECK_NREADY`, `CHECK_NDISCARDED`, then we
> > could have replaced `CHECK(!candidacy.isDiscarded());` for consistency. Do
> > you want to do it here or follow up with another patch?
>
> Neil Conway w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/#review131167
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46827]
Passed command: expo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/
---
(Updated April 29, 2016, 2:08 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Alexander Rukl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/#review131084
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [46826, 46827]
Passed comman
> On April 29, 2016, 9:29 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > It would be great to implement `CHECK_NREADY`, `CHECK_NDISCARDED`, then we
> > could have replaced `CHECK(!candidacy.isDiscarded());` for consistency. Do
> > you want to do it here or follow up with another patch?
Seems reasonable
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/#review131066
---
It would be great to implement `CHECK_NREADY`, `CHECK_NDISCARDED`,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46827/
---
Review request for mesos and Alexander Rukletsov.
Repository: mesos
Descripti
