Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14490
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14455
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r73468912
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -218,9 +221,44 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63209/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73470304
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63206/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73467467
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
**[Test build #63206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63206/consoleFull)**
for PR 14474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73471840
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73472950
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14365
**[Test build #63214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63214/consoleFull)**
for PR 14365 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73467397
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -206,22 +206,22 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63209/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
I'd like to make `CreateStruct` extends `Unevaluable` and remove the
evaluation logic. Then we can have a rule `ResolveCreateStruct` and put it in
batch `Resolution`.
---
If your project is set
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73471330
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73466174
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13459#discussion_r73467020
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -72,6 +72,47 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
benchmark
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #63216 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63216/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73469639
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63213/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14470
**[Test build #63213 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63213/consoleFull)**
for PR 14470 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14182
LGTM. Thanks @wangmiao1981
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14156
@srowen yeah, the function supplied here called cannot be turned into SIMD
instructions but I think it can do some parallelization optimization on large
matrix, for example we can split the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14472#discussion_r73473216
--- Diff: dev/.rat-excludes ---
@@ -99,4 +99,5 @@ spark-deps-.*
.*tsv
org.apache.spark.scheduler.ExternalClusterManager
.*\.sql
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73466961
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14476
**[Test build #63217 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63217/consoleFull)**
for PR 14476 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73471131
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63219 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63219/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13459#discussion_r73466753
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
var res = rdd
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14490
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63207/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73467821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73467801
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73469309
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63211/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63211/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63218 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63218/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
`execute it once` is not that important for this simple rule, I think it's
ok to put it in Resolution batch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ganeshchand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14491
I did verify Python code and Streaming docs. They are OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73468039
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14490
**[Test build #63215 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63215/consoleFull)**
for PR 14490 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73469783
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -62,6 +66,122 @@ private[sql] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73472871
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -933,23 +933,6 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63222/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user clockfly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474#discussion_r73502710
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63223/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63223/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73507669
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -423,18 +430,38 @@ private[spark]
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63224 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63224/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73506081
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -357,4 +375,194 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73507862
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -357,4 +375,194 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73508196
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -357,4 +375,194 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73508359
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -357,4 +375,194 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r73508367
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1032,11 +977,6 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14493
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
@maver1ck I think you need to open another pr for change in Catalog.scala.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14476
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63217/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14476
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user inouehrs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13459
@cloud-fan Thank you for the comment. I removed the backToBackMapPrimitive
benchmark from this PR. I am going to open a new PR for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63220/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
**[Test build #63220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63220/consoleFull)**
for PR 14390 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13459
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13459
OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user avulanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13621
@sethah Thank you for posting the result of your experiment! It looks
interesting. It is hard to say how good does it work without numerical results
for a particular application, such as e.g.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
**[Test build #63222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63222/consoleFull)**
for PR 13868 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450#discussion_r73511032
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java
---
@@ -204,7 +205,8 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63225 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63225/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63226/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
GitHub user shiv4nsh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14493
[#SPARK-16897] Refactored the code and changed the var to val
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated the documentation with the correct use of val instead of var
##
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63223 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63223/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73507465
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -423,18 +430,38 @@ private[spark]
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73508076
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -357,4 +375,194 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14450#discussion_r73510962
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java
---
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
**[Test build #63224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63224/consoleFull)**
for PR 14155 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63224/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63210/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
**[Test build #63220 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63220/consoleFull)**
for PR 14390 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14478
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73474964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -420,45 +420,40 @@ private[sql] abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73477850
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -319,12 +319,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14365
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63214/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73478952
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -319,12 +319,26 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14490
**[Test build #63215 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63215/consoleFull)**
for PR 14490 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63221 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63221/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14481
**[Test build #3202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14481 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14175
@mgummelt, will do it soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14481
**[Test build #3202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3202/consoleFull)**
for PR 14481 at commit
GitHub user maver1ck reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14390
[SPARK-15541] Casting ConcurrentHashMap to ConcurrentMap (branch-1.6)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Casting ConcurrentHashMap to ConcurrentMap allows to run code
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482#discussion_r73478351
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -420,45 +420,40 @@ private[sql] abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
**[Test build #63218 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63218/consoleFull)**
for PR 14482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14482
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63218/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
