Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67406/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
[`b1e77ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67406/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Will review this PR tomorrow. Thanks for your work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
I'm going to merge this first. Please submit a follow-up pr to move other
ones.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
I think we can merge this one first, since it is no worse than the Hive
one. Then we can think about how to make it more robust.
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
(Actually I'm on an airplane and the internet is not good enough to merge
patches).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
cc @cloud-fan can you merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
LGTM too. Unforunately my internet sucks (on a plane) and I can't merge
this right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591451
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/AggregationQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -851,6 +851,42 @@ abstract class AggregationQuerySuite
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591458
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/AggregationQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -851,6 +851,42 @@ abstract class AggregationQuerySuite
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
yeah, LGTM, it doesn't change current outputPartitioning of operators.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591459
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Tes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84591475
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1455,50 +1455,59 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest wit
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84591482
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -125,7 +129,7 @@ case class DescribeFunctionCommand(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591480
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -613,6 +613,46 @@ object functions {
def min(columnName: String): Column = m
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Is there a way we can add some expression level unit tests for this? I
realized we don't really have existing infrastructure for unit testing
aggregate expressions (only for non-aggregate expressions).
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15597
cc @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`d74c96d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
@marmbrus Sure (I didn't mean I am not going to do this..), I just handled
the case in this PR for `to_json`.
BTW, I would like to note that there are the same problems in other JSON
re
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`8603462`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`d74c96d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`518f48d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592806
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +99,15 @@ object FileSourceStrategy
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592805
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +99,15 @@ object FileSourceStrategy
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
**[Test build #67410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14957 at commit
[`ab8f5ec`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrateg
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592816
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrateg
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrateg
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`feafdc2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrateg
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592876
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
.
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -661,6 +666,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable wi
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592888
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -571,6 +571,37 @@ class ParquetQuer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`8603462`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
[SPARK-17123][SQL][BRANCH-2.0] Use type-widened encoder for DataFrame for
set operations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR backports https://github.com/apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`b233d09`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`9154463`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15599
I think we don't know exactly what the real exception is. The NPE occurs
while handling the exception.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`8b94909`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
[`518f48d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
For development time, use an IDE or maybe SBT to do incremental
compilation, which is even faster. I don't otherwise see a strong use case for
not compiling tests. Yes it's slower to compile tests, b
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
Merging to master. Thanks! Ping me for the follow-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
**[Test build #67410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14957 at commit
[`ab8f5ec`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`feafdc2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`8b94909`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`b233d09`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
LGTM. Merging to branch-2.0. Could you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
[`9154463`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
closing this since, its maybe not the right way to do this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user techaddict closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`2656c62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
**[Test build #67416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/consoleFull)**
for PR 15595 at commit
[`e691714`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597530
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -970,9 +1270,19 @@ case class Round(child: E
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597610
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/xml/xpath.scala
---
@@ -150,8 +206,16 @@ case class XPathString(xml: Expr
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597661
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/windowExpressions.scala
---
@@ -692,9 +722,11 @@ case class DenseRank(chi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84597837
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/ApproximatePercentile.scala
---
@@ -49,21 +49,29 @@ import org.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
I prefer to minimizing the words without showing any information. Below is
an example.
```
Arguments:
class - a string literal that represents a fully-qualified class name.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Another example:
```
Arguments:
expr1 - a numeric expression.
expr2 - a numeric expression.
```
->
```
Arguments:
expr1 - Data type: numeric.
expr2 -
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
We should also add the default value in the argument description. Below is
an example.
```
Arguments:
col - a numeric expression.
percentage - a numeric literal or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
Sorry, will review it soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
**[Test build #67416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/consoleFull)**
for PR 15595 at commit
[`e691714`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
[`2656c62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67415/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441#discussion_r84599733
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UISeleniumSuite.scala ---
@@ -651,6 +671,15 @@ class UISeleniumSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
WebBrowse
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
It is relatively straight forward to test `ImperativeAggregate`s. See:
-
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.HyperLogLogPlusPlusSuite
-
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
sure, doing that now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
@CodingCat could you open a backport for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
[`0162c81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595#discussion_r84600424
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -377,4 +377,23 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends An
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Just saw that this got merged. I had a tiny nit but its ok without it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
[`6b29002`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
merged to branch-2.0 and then cherry-picked to master for the error message
fix not in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
