Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71400/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
**[Test build #71400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71400/testReport)**
for PR 16561 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71401/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
**[Test build #71403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71403/testReport)**
for PR 16588 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71403/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373#discussion_r96149748
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/show-tables.sql.out
---
@@ -128,62 +128,108 @@ SHOW TABLE EXTENDED
-- !query 13
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
**[Test build #71407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71407/testReport)**
for PR 16587 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16208
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71404/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16208
**[Test build #71404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71404/testReport)**
for PR 16208 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
**[Test build #71408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71408/testReport)**
for PR 16528 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
**[Test build #71401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71401/testReport)**
for PR 16587 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586#discussion_r96149617
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
sql(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587#discussion_r96145383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -758,15 +758,17 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587#discussion_r96145363
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -370,22 +370,6 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
**[Test build #71401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71401/testReport)**
for PR 16587 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
[SPARK-19092] [SQL] [Backport-2.1] Save() API of DataFrameWriter should not
scan all the saved files #16481
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
**[Test build #71402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71402/testReport)**
for PR 16588 at commit
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541
Added benchmarks.
I didn't find any standardized way of benchmarking codegen so I wrote a
simple script for Spark Shell. Benchmarks were run on a laptop so the
collections couldn't be
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
**[Test build #71403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71403/testReport)**
for PR 16588 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16249
it turns out `$0` is not reliable
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/59895/getting-the-source-directory-of-a-bash-script-from-within).
Updated and tested on Ubuntu and Mac.
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373#discussion_r96150183
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -619,18 +621,34 @@ case class ShowTablesCommand(
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71402/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Recently, CBO introduces many changes in this part. Let me revisit it.
Thank you for the reviews! @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16588
**[Test build #71402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71402/testReport)**
for PR 16588 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16208
**[Test build #71404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71404/testReport)**
for PR 16208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #71405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71405/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16249
**[Test build #71406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71406/testReport)**
for PR 16249 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16595
[Minor][YARN] Move YarnSchedulerBackendSuite to resource-managers/yarn
directory.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#16092 moves YARN resource manager related code to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #71424 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71424/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
thanks, merging to master/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
**[Test build #71425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71425/testReport)**
for PR 16387 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r9617
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,146 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592
**[Test build #71420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71420/testReport)**
for PR 16592 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
**[Test build #71417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71417/testReport)**
for PR 16474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
[SPARK-17078] [SQL] Show stats when explain
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we can only check the estimated stats in logical plans by
debugging. We need to
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
cc @rxin @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561#discussion_r96175295
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -89,6 +89,25 @@ object Cast {
case _ => false
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
**[Test build #71426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71426/testReport)**
for PR 16561 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
@samkum Thanks for testing this. I think it is because every time
`forceSpill` is called now, it will spill the map anyway. I will add a check to
only spill the map if the map is not empty.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16595
**[Test build #71427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71427/testReport)**
for PR 16595 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16592
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16573
**[Test build #71392 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71392/testReport)**
for PR 16573 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16545
So you're saying it works fine, you just take issue with the internal
method/doc name? OK, but in the non-partitioned case, deleting everything is
also a matter of deleting `/a*`. Implicitly there
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576
**[Test build #71394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71394/testReport)**
for PR 16576 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
The only added comments are as blow:
```python
# __kwdefaults__ contains the default values of keyword-only arguments
which are
# introduced from Python 3. The possible cases
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
**[Test build #71393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71393/consoleFull)**
for PR 16158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71396/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
**[Test build #71396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71396/testReport)**
for PR 16429 at commit
Github user zdh2292390 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16415
@jkbradley I 've updated again to specify the storage level via a Param ,
please check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
**[Test build #71395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71395/testReport)**
for PR 16527 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15928
codegen for `UDF`:
```
== Subtree 1 / 1 ==
*Project [HiveSimpleUDF#org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.udf.UDFToDouble(id#1012L)
AS f(id)#1017]
+- *Range (0, 3, step=1, splits=Some(1))
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16573
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16561
**[Test build #71400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71400/testReport)**
for PR 16561 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r96144606
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,146 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r96144629
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,146 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r96144837
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -146,12 +146,16 @@ test_that("spark.lda with libsvm", {
topics <-
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
This is great, just one minor test comment.
@yanboliang what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16587
[SPARK-19229] [SQL] Disallow Creating Hive Source Tables when Hive Support
is Not Enabled
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is weird to create Hive source tables when
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586#discussion_r96142347
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
sql(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
**[Test build #71399 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71399/testReport)**
for PR 16586 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71399/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16568
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
Yes, I'm suggesting the behavior you describe isn't desirable. Right now,
if there are 150 items and max is 100, it will delete 50. That's good. There's
no good reason to delete 10 more than needed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #71391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71391/testReport)**
for PR 14038 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71391/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
(I re-ran `./run-tests --python-executables=python3.6` for sure)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
@gatorsmile Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553#discussion_r96137414
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaUDFSuite.java ---
@@ -108,4 +109,24 @@ public void udf3Test() {
result =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
**[Test build #71397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71397/testReport)**
for PR 16429 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71397/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
Build started: [TESTS] `ALL`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71395/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
**[Test build #71398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71398/testReport)**
for PR 16553 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16553
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71398/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
@liancheng Could you check this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71393/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
