Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73713/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
**[Test build #73717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73717/testReport)**
for PR 17129 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
I think this is ready for a final review @jkbradley @davies - thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17110#discussion_r103813679
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/ChiSquareSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
**[Test build #3588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3588/testReport)**
for PR 14299 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17106
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73712/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73712/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73720/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73722 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73722/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73722/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
**[Test build #73713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73713/testReport)**
for PR 16782 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73716/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73714/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #73714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73714/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
**[Test build #3588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3588/testReport)**
for PR 14299 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17124
**[Test build #3589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3589/testReport)**
for PR 17124 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #73719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73719/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73715/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17031
Your understanding is correct. You must set refuse_seconds for all your
frameworks to some value N, such that N >= #frameworks. So for this change, if
some operator is running >120 frameworks,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17124
**[Test build #3589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3589/testReport)**
for PR 17124 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122#discussion_r103838737
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenExec.scala
---
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ trait CodegenSupport extends SparkPlan
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
@mgummelt I merged this to 2.1 (and so you will have to close this PR
manually) but the cherry-pick to 2.0.x doesn't succeed either, and it's
non-trivial. If you're willing to evaluate the conflict
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r103822448
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -240,12 +240,13 @@ class FPGrowthModel private[ml] (
val predictUDF =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73718/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73718/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user skambha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
- Changes to the SQLQueryTestSuite framework to mask the exprId so I can
add the -ve cases as well using this framework.
- Added -ve test cases to the SQLQueryTestSuite framework and so removed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73722/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user mgummelt closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
@steveloughran thanks for the comments.
@marmbrus @zsxwing it'd be great if you could share some thoughts!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73718/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17106
Thank you for merging, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73716/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73720/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73719/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #73719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73719/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #73723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73723/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73720/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73724/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17110#discussion_r103813169
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/ChiSquare.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
2.1 is sufficient. Thanks for the merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
**[Test build #3590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3590/testReport)**
for PR 17123 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122#discussion_r103837174
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -434,6 +434,17 @@ case class RangeExec(range:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
**[Test build #73714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73714/testReport)**
for PR 17100 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73716/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
**[Test build #73709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73709/testReport)**
for PR 16782 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73709/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73721/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17125
cc @gatorsmile @cloud-fan Please have a look at this when you have time,
thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user stanzhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
[SPARK-19373][MESOS] Base spark.scheduler.minRegisteredResourceRatio â¦
â¦on registered cores rather than accepted cores
See JIRA
Unit tests, Mesos/Spark integration tests
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
@srowen As discussed here
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17045#issuecomment-283192230, this is the
backport of SPARK-19373 into branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73717/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17129
**[Test build #73717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73717/testReport)**
for PR 17129 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
**[Test build #3590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3590/testReport)**
for PR 17123 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
**[Test build #73715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73715/testReport)**
for PR 17081 at commit
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
[SPARK-19791] [ML] Add doc and example for fpgrowth
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a new section for fpm
Add Example for FPGrowth in scala and Java
##
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73715/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
@tgravescs , the main scenario is external shuffle service unavailable
scenario, this could be happened in working preserving + NM failure situation.
Also like Mesos + external standalone shuffle
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
\cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17080
\cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
@stanzhai Could you submit another PR to backport it to Spark 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17121
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
**[Test build #73689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73689/testReport)**
for PR 17122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
**[Test build #73690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73690/testReport)**
for PR 17119 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
**[Test build #73691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73691/testReport)**
for PR 17120 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #73695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/testReport)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73693/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73692/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73694/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #73695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/testReport)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Style police. FWIW I think the lines that failed were already >100 chars,
it was just they got indented slightly more.
```
Scalastyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[error]
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
-1, non binding
I understand the rationale for this, to aid migration from s3/s3n to s3a,
but given the need is schema independence, you should be using the full path
name from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #73723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73723/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099#discussion_r103844650
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/inner-join.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+-- Automatically generated by SQLQueryTestSuite
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@kayousterhout It takes some time to update the test report.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103850385
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +385,66 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r103852025
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -83,29 +95,150 @@ object RewritePredicateSubquery
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
