Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74304/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74300/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74302/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Thank you for pointing out `InterpretedPredicate`. Now, `newPredicate`
always returns `Predicate` that can be executed by calling `eval()`.
It looks simpler and better than the first
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r105351636
--- Diff: R/pkg/DESCRIPTION ---
@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ Collate:
'types.R'
'utils.R'
'window.R'
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r105351890
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -610,6 +610,71 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74311/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74310/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74310/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74311/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74311/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74312/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74313/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #74306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74306/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74307/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17238
Please change the title per http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
@squito or @vanzin do you know enough to evaluate this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17239
Please close this @nischay21
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74308/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
**[Test build #74309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74309/testReport)**
for PR 17236 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
... The end-to-end test cases in `VersionSuite.scala` does not use the
expected hive client versions. Need to fix that at first.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74308 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74308/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74308/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74310/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105351477
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -78,9 +78,42 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236#discussion_r105351724
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -319,7 +322,7 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r105351937
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -610,6 +610,71 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r105351821
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -610,6 +610,71 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236#discussion_r105352149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -319,7 +322,7 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74312/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
@cloud-fan can we also check `Distinct`? We rewrite this into an
`Aggregate` in the optimizer, which has the same problem with `MapType`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74312/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17212
This actually covers SPARK-14453 too then. It relates to SPARK-12344 but
doesn't fully resolve it. We can link all these in the title though.
Yes, I support removing these props as they have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
**[Test build #74309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74309/testReport)**
for PR 17236 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
This looks like a bunch of change for an addendum -- should this not have
gone into the original change? the title isn't descriptive here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74309/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ep1804 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177
@jbax
They are not CSV inputs. They are RAW TEXT.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #74306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74306/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240#discussion_r105368096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -36,27 +36,27 @@ case class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240#discussion_r105368212
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240#discussion_r105368556
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -122,46 +123,59 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74307/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
**[Test build #74317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74317/testReport)**
for PR 17236 at commit
GitHub user wzhfy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
[SPARK-17080][SQL][followup] simplify algorithm
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Do column pruning during reordering is troublesome. We can do it right
after
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
**[Test build #74314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74314/testReport)**
for PR 17240 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179
**[Test build #74315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74315/testReport)**
for PR 17179 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74306/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
also cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r105363636
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -256,94 +257,6 @@ case class StateStoreSaveExec(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240#discussion_r105368297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -87,8 +88,8 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74307/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
**[Test build #74316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74316/testReport)**
for PR 17236 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
LGTM pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240#discussion_r105371649
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -122,46 +123,59 @@ case class
Github user amitsela commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r105396443
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -61,25 +65,49 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74321/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
Github user ConeyLiu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user ConeyLiu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
[SPARK-19901][Core]Clean up the clunky method signature of acquireMemory
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up the clunky method signature of acquireMemory.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
Sorry for the mistake, reopen it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user amitsela commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17179#discussion_r105395680
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -61,25 +65,49 @@ import
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
This doesn't look simpler to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
You're right of course:
[SPARK-19899](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19899).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
**[Test build #74319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74319/testReport)**
for PR 17242 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74319/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164#discussion_r105407263
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggregateCodegenHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17242
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user ConeyLiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
[SPARK-19901][Core]Clean up the clunky method signature of acquireMemory
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Clean up the clunky method signature of acquireMemory.
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164#discussion_r105403332
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggregateCodegenHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #74322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74322/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74320/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74320/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241
**[Test build #74318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74318/testReport)**
for PR 17241 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74318/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164#discussion_r105404213
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -106,6 +105,126 @@ case class SortAggregateExec(
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222#discussion_r105392650
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -484,6 +484,21 @@ class UDFRegistration private[sql] (functionRegistry:
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164#discussion_r105404064
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggregateCodegenHelper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17244
[SPARK-19889][SQL] Make TaskContext callbacks thread safe
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It is sometimes useful to use multiple threads in a task to parallelize
tasks.
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17244
cc @rxin @sameeragarwal @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17244
**[Test build #74323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74323/testReport)**
for PR 17244 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17245
[SPARK-19850][SQL] Allow the use of aliases in SQL function calls
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently cannot use aliases in SQL function calls. This is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74322/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
