Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
**[Test build #74988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74988/testReport)**
for PR 17302 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #74990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74990/testReport)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17377#discussion_r107235659
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -625,6 +625,10 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17377#discussion_r107235501
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -369,10 +369,10 @@ def csv(self, path, schema=None, sep=None,
encoding=None, quote=None, escape=Non
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17377
So far, the documentation of these data source options are missing. In the
last release, we clean up the [JDBC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74990/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17377#discussion_r107243921
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/ParseMode.scala
---
@@ -17,25 +17,35 @@
package
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17360
@yanboliang Thanks for your feedback! The design of the optimizer
interface, or even whether it should be included at all, is definitely open for
discussion and your suggestions are much
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Will take a look this week
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wolf31o2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14694
This is useful for the Spark HistoryServer, especially if it's configured
to store history in HDFS. That's where I've run into this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17364
looking some more, yes, as `tryWithSafeFinallyAndFailureCallbacks` wraps
task commit, it guarantees that the original cause doesn't get lost. The
abortJob code isn't so well guarded, and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
You do not need to open the new JIRA. You can still use the same JIRA number
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
Yep, thanks for confirming that @srowen and checking it out @imatiach-msft
and @MLnick !
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74988/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74986/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
**[Test build #74992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74992/testReport)**
for PR 17302 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
**[Test build #74993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74993/testReport)**
for PR 17166 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
@zhaorongsheng Not sure whether you can help us check whether all the
functions have an issue in nullability setting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107232894
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContextImpl.scala ---
@@ -140,16 +140,22 @@ private[spark] class TaskContextImpl(
}
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
> @mallman can you send a new PR for 2.0? thanks!
Will do. Do I need to open a new JIRA ticket for that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17295
**[Test build #74991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74991/testReport)**
for PR 17295 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
**[Test build #74986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74986/testReport)**
for PR 17350 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17302
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17377
Definitely. Thanks for asking it. Let me open another PR soon for both.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #74990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74990/testReport)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17350
LGTM
Since it is very close to code freeze, let me merge it to master and 2.1 at
first. You can submit the PR to address the issues as a follow-up PR. Thanks!
---
If your project is
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342#discussion_r107215428
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SharedState.scala ---
@@ -148,6 +149,8 @@ private[sql] class SharedState(val sparkContext:
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17336
**[Test build #74995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74995/testReport)**
for PR 17336 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17378
[SPARK-20046][SQL] Facilitate loop optimizations in a JIT compiler
regarding sqlContext.read.parquet()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves performance of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17378
**[Test build #74996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74996/testReport)**
for PR 17378 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107233146
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -302,12 +298,12 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
// If
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107239694
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -467,7 +474,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107235395
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -569,8 +575,10 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107237325
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ private[spark] class PythonRunner(
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107235703
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ case object TaskResultLost extends TaskFailedReason {
*
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107234055
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContextImpl.scala ---
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskContextImpl(
/** List of callback
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166#discussion_r107234445
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -160,15 +160,20 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
// A flag
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
I agree with @srowen I dont see how this change affects the test.
`blocksWithReleasedLocks` should be unchanged w.r.t this test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #74994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74994/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74994/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #74994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74994/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
**[Test build #74930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74930/testReport)**
for PR 17312 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74936/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74936/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r107080177
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -836,17 +836,30 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74946/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17354
late LGTM~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74930/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Please add this test case too. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
okay, I'll add soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74944/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
**[Test build #74942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74942/testReport)**
for PR 17368 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16906
**[Test build #74944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74944/testReport)**
for PR 16906 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
Close it as _inferSchema is still used in many places.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17367
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Please update PR description and title.
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74948/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17369
**[Test build #74949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74949/testReport)**
for PR 17369 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r107083369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -836,17 +836,30 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353#discussion_r107080002
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CostBasedJoinReorder.scala
---
@@ -152,6 +156,10 @@ object JoinReorderDP
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17368
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74942/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
**[Test build #74947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74947/testReport)**
for PR 17353 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17335
**[Test build #74946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74946/testReport)**
for PR 17335 at commit
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17369
[SPARK-20041][DOC] Update docs for NaN handling in approxQuantile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update docs for NaN handling in approxQuantile.
## How was
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74948/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74948/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17293
**[Test build #74950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74950/testReport)**
for PR 17293 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #74951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74951/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74951/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17369
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74949/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17353
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74945/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74938/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74941/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #74952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74952/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17370
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user okoethibm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17370
[SPARK-20042] [Web UI] Fix log page buttons for reverse proxy mode
with spark.ui.reverseProxy=true, full path URLs like /log will point to
the master web endpoint which is serving the worker
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17371
[SPARK-19903][PYSPARK][SS] window operator miss the `watermark` metadata of
time column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
reproduce code:
```
import sys
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17310
**[Test build #74960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74960/testReport)**
for PR 17310 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17372
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74961/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17371
**[Test build #74959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74959/testReport)**
for PR 17371 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17371#discussion_r107095629
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1163,7 +1163,10 @@ def check_string_field(field, fieldName):
raise TypeError("%s should
1 - 100 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
