Github user 10110346 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711#discussion_r129251166
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1103,10 +1103,10 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
The
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129251081
--- Diff: sql/log4j.properties ---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#
--- End diff --
Oh, actually, I think I can get rid of this. Let me try.
---
GitHub user caneGuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18730
[SPARK-21527][CORE] Use buffer limit in order to use JAVA NIO Util's
buffercache
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now, ChunkedByteBuffer#writeFully do not slice
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79930/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79930/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
@srowen, so, the current structure is like ...
```
.
âââ docs
âââ sql
âââ create-docs.sh # Genenerates HTMLs.
âââ
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79932/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79932/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Oh I see, it's for consistency. Well OK stay consistent with R/Python then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
Thanks @sethah @hhbyyh for the review. I updated the behavior doc string as
suggested.
Any other comments? cc @srowen @jkbradley @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
**[Test build #79934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79934/testReport)**
for PR 18513 at commit
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18731
[SPARK-20990][SQL] Read all JSON documents in files when multiline mode is
on
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR improves the JSON parsing so that now all the
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18726
IIUC I think close context again which is already closed is fine to Spark,
though neither your code nor the previous one can handle spark context creation
failure related object leakage.
---
If
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18728
Hm, is the more basic error here that `object ValidatorParamsSuiteHelpers
extends SparkFunSuite` ? it seems like it's trying to leverage the temp dir
cleanup function in the superclass, but it will
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711#discussion_r129248960
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1103,10 +1103,10 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
The
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18726
@jerryshao
I think close Sparkcontext again that is little significance.
Because they are closed again.
spark prompt `SparkContext already stopped.`
---
If your project is
Github user djvulee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
I update the code, please take a look at @vanzin @tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
(I got rid of log4j file by avoiding directly accessing to JVM)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18723
Thank you. 1. makes sense since memory is allocated by 2x at that point.
While I looked at a [PR](https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/464) for
netty, I cannot understand why 16 was used.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
(sorry, I just edited the structure above to be more correct)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user caneGuy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18723
@kiszk Actually, i am confused with default value 16 too.
Yes, it occurs in specific scenario.In our case, it was large size block
data which caused this issue.
---
If your project is set up
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Thank you @srowen. I will double check and clean up minor nits and will
ping you within tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
**[Test build #79925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79925/testReport)**
for PR 18711 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129250088
--- Diff: sql/log4j.properties ---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#
--- End diff --
This is used -
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18726
I don't see a significant overhead here by calling `stop()` again. I don't
see a strong reason to change the code here AFAIK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79925/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129245068
--- Diff: sql/gen-sql-markdown.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129245196
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/copy_api_dirs.rb ---
@@ -150,4 +150,31 @@
cp("../R/pkg/DESCRIPTION", "api")
end
+ if not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129244802
--- Diff: sql/log4j.properties ---
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#
--- End diff --
Pardon, is a log4j.properties really needed here? what reads it?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722
**[Test build #3851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3851/testReport)**
for PR 18722 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610
There was a _lot_ of discussion around the `KMeans` initial model. But here
we seem to be just ignoring certain issues. Such as, does the `initialModel`
override the param settings (e.g. reg param,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
**[Test build #79928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79928/testReport)**
for PR 18651 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79928/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
In any case, it is easy. I was just thinking of matching it up with, like,
R and Python which are, up to my knowledge, something like the below:
**R**:
```
.
âââ docs
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729
Hi there, thanks for this. However, please see #18610 and related JIRA
tickets. The solution is slightly more complex and needs to be done in a more
generic way. I suggest that this be updated once
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129244806
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,16 +421,15 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{%
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79926/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79926/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79926/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
**[Test build #79929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79929/testReport)**
for PR 18503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79932/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Yeah the latter is what I had in mind but I don't know, is it hard? it does
seem more natural to generate the output directly into its destination, I
think, unless I'm overlooking something else the
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711#discussion_r129246022
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -580,7 +580,13 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
* The number of
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129248977
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{% endhighlight
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722
**[Test build #3851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3851/testReport)**
for PR 18722 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79927/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79927/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79930/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711
**[Test build #79925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79925/testReport)**
for PR 18711 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
**[Test build #79924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79924/testReport)**
for PR 18503 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18730
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
@sameeragarwal Do you think this change still makes sense? Can I improve it
somehow?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18711#discussion_r129245415
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -580,7 +580,13 @@ private[deploy] class Master(
* The number of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18693
**[Test build #3850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3850/testReport)**
for PR 18693 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129251387
--- Diff: sql/gen-sql-markdown.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79927/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503#discussion_r129257673
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/HDFSBackedStateStoreProvider.scala
---
@@ -363,7 +363,8 @@ private[state]
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18709
LGTM except one comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
I addressed the log4j comment for now first (I got rid of log4j file by
avoiding directly accessing to JVM)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18693
**[Test build #3850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3850/testReport)**
for PR 18693 at commit
Github user lizhaoch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722#discussion_r129246403
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -421,16 +421,15 @@ $ YOUR_SPARK_HOME/bin/spark-submit \
Lines with a: 46, Lines with b: 23
{% endhighlight
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702#discussion_r129254786
--- Diff: docs/_plugins/copy_api_dirs.rb ---
@@ -150,4 +150,31 @@
cp("../R/pkg/DESCRIPTION", "api")
end
+ if not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79924/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18709#discussion_r129259658
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -932,6 +934,7 @@ private[hive] object HiveClientImpl {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
**[Test build #79928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79928/testReport)**
for PR 18651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79931/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79933/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18731
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user joosterman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
@alg-jmx Issue is fixed for Spark 2.2.0 according the ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
**[Test build #79929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79929/testReport)**
for PR 18503 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79929/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user heary-cao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79931/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79933/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18731
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848
**[Test build #79936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79936/testReport)**
for PR 17848 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
**[Test build #79934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79934/testReport)**
for PR 18513 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79934/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18722
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18702
**[Test build #79931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79931/testReport)**
for PR 18702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848
**[Test build #79935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79935/testReport)**
for PR 17848 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388
@tgravescs
Thanks for help.
> I think we should expand the description of the config to say what
happens when the limit is hit. Since its not using real flow control a user
might set
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610#discussion_r129324027
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -365,7 +398,11 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18707
**[Test build #79937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79937/testReport)**
for PR 18707 at commit
Github user pgandhi999 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18707#discussion_r129330779
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsTab.scala
---
@@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ class ExecutorsListener(storageStatusListener:
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18651
LGTM. @vanzin anything further?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848
let's leave the java UDF API unchanged and think about whether we should
add java UDF API in `functions` later. @gatorsmile can you update the PR
title? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
