Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Hi, @srowen I have fixed deprecation warnings. We should also use
mimaBinaryIssueFilters and mimaPreviousArtifacts instead of deprecated
binaryIssueFilters and previousArtifacts in MimaBuild.scala.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69591/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69591/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`1ff4c65`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69591/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`1ff4c65`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Do you happen to know if the changes to the SBT build will still work with
earlier versions of SBT? that is, is it just some cleanup or some required
change?
Regarding plugins, maven plugins
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Hi, @srowen Thanks for the review. I have updated the PR to fix deprecation
warnings (about '`previousArtifact`', '`/`', '`stringToReference`', '`<+= `'
operator, '`t3ToTable3`', '`<<=`' operator)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69551/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69551 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69551/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`0c2d20b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69551 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69551/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`0c2d20b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
+1 for 2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69453/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69453/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`62f0ddb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
I will update the PR to fix the deprecation warnings in
project/SparkBuild.scala.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Thanks, @dongjoon-hyun Yes, Good catch. I have updated the description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
@srowen Thanks for the information.
For sbt update, I think, currently, the only file needed to change is
`project/build.properties`. The [Jenkins build console
output](https://amplab.cs.b
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
nit. In PR description, 0.3.9 instead of 0.13.9 ?
> zinc: 0.13.9 -> 0.3.11,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69453/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`62f0ddb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
20 matches
Mail list logo
