[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2018-06-08 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-12-14 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-14 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
**[Test build #3529 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3529/testReport)**
 for PR 16556 at commit 
[`db73727`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/db737275d563b6057a5b4a2f116badc1f362f2f0).
 * This patch **fails PySpark unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-14 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
**[Test build #3529 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3529/testReport)**
 for PR 16556 at commit 
[`db73727`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/db737275d563b6057a5b4a2f116badc1f362f2f0).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-13 Thread tygert
Github user tygert commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
What do you think, @srowen and @hl475, should this entail modifying Breeze 
in order to leverage LAPACK, or should this bug fix get accepted as it stands?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-12 Thread tygert
Github user tygert commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
Maybe @hl475 could add his remark about how "we don't use LAPACK here since 
there is no pivoted QR in LAPACK that stops when the rank is exhausted" to the 
inline comments he highlighted? Incidentally, RSVDPACK -- 
https://github.com/sergeyvoronin/LowRankMatrixDecompositionCodes -- does 
include the necessary routine, but neither Spark nor Breeze is planning to 
incorporate the new RSVDPACK so far as I know.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-12 Thread hl475
Github user hl475 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
@srowen: We don’t use LAPACK here since there is no pivoted QR in LAPACK 
that stops when the rank is exhausted. This is highlighted in the inline 
comments [563 to 
565](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556/files#diff-00e48e38779d4534190bf78a0fd962dbR563).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-12 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
Is there not a library method for this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16556: [SPARK-19184][MLlib] Improve numerical stability for met...

2017-01-11 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org