On 3/12/07, inode0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, if FSF asserts a copyright, I cannot distribute it
under any terms, unless there is a further permission to do so. I don't
think public domain is that further permission.
John Summerfield wrote:
But the question is whether that particular file is in the public
domain, or whether it's copyright. It
It says:
// Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
// This file is in the public domain.
Its in public domain, and the work is done by the FSF.
I don't
inode0 wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inode0 wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping RH is still paying attention to this list
Ok, but the gettext package upstream is clearly distributed under the
GPL Versioin 2 or later.
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ head -5
/usr/share/doc/gettext-devel-0.14.6/examples/hello-java-awt/Hello.java
// Example for use of GNU gettext.
// Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
// This file is
On 3/12/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, if FSF asserts a copyright, I cannot distribute it
under any terms, unless there is a further permission to do so. I don't
think public domain is that further permission.
Doesn't the statement that the subpackage in
-list@redhat.com
Sent: Sun Mar 11 16:53:46 2007
Subject: [rhelv5-beta-list] Is Red Hat allowed to distribute this?
I am looking at my screen which looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ head -5
/usr/share/doc/gettext-devel-0.14.6/examples/hello-java-awt/Hello.java
// Example for use of GNU gettext
Stanley, Jon wrote:
It says the license is LGPL in the rpm -qi that you gave below - is that not
the case? Is some other license actually included?
All that is is the packager's interpretation of something {s,}he read. I
wouldn't give it any weight at all.
Probably, as its from FSF, that
inode0 wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking at my screen which looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ head -5
/usr/share/doc/gettext-devel-0.14.6/examples/hello-java-awt/Hello.java
// Example for use of GNU gettext.
// Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software
inode0 wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping RH is still paying attention to this list
Ok, but the gettext package upstream is clearly distributed under the
GPL Versioin 2 or later. So what again are you worried about? If the
piece in question
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inode0 wrote:
On 3/11/07, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking at my screen which looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ head -5
/usr/share/doc/gettext-devel-0.14.6/examples/hello-java-awt/Hello.java
// Example for
10 matches
Mail list logo
