On 3/12/07, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I understand it, if FSF asserts a copyright, I cannot distribute it under any terms, unless there is a further permission to do so. I don't think "public domain" is that further permission.
Doesn't the statement that the subpackage in which it is contained is covered by the GPL mean anything? What is the purpose of the COPYING file in the subpackage if it is not the granting of rights by the copyright holder you are looking for? Clearly this is fouled up as we have agreed. The FSF should fix it and I'm sure they will. I'll bring it to their attention just to end this thread. :) John _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
