Re: Riak KV performance in sensor data storage application

Greetings! Thanks to everybody who cared to read the PSTA article. DeadZen: we have no plans for LevelDB/LevelEd experiments for now. We seem to have Bitcask doing what we need at the moment and switched to application development. Thanks for bringing LevelEd to our attention, it looks

Re: Riak KV performance in sensor data storage application

I suspect with the test environment having only 4GB of RAM and a single slow disk per node - both Leveldb and Leveled are going to struggle in terms of the write throughput. As n=1 in this test, some of the advantages of Leveled will be lost also (e.g. the n HEADs advantage). I thought the paper

Re: Riak KV performance in sensor data storage application

This looks cool, and might give some indication that back pressure should be aware of available file system space.. Any plans on LevelDB testing? A newer option Leveled might be cool to compare with as well. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Grigory Fateyev wrote: > Yury, thank

Re: Riak KV performance in sensor data storage application

Yury, thank you for sharing your investigations. It is very useful to read! 2017-10-03 8:32 GMT+03:00 Yury Shevchuk : > Greetings! > > We have published a paper on the subject. It may be of interest for > Riak developers and users who put Riak under heavy write load. > >

Riak KV performance in sensor data storage application

Greetings! We have published a paper on the subject. It may be of interest for Riak developers and users who put Riak under heavy write load. English: http://psta.psiras.ru/read/psta2017_3_61-85.pdf Russian (native): http://psta.psiras.ru/read/psta2017_3_31-60.pdf Best, -- Yury