Re: Efficiency of RIAK

},{delete, 1}] which means that out of every 9 operations, 'get' will be called four times, 'put' will called four times, and 'delete' will be called once, on average. % Run 80% gets, 20% puts {operations, [{get, 4}, {put, 1}]}. === Denis -- View this message

Re: Efficiency of RIAK

I mean, this is equivalent to... :) Denis -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Efficiency-of-RIAK-tp4025765p4025783.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ riak-users mailing list

Re: Efficiency of RIAK

RIAK does not make sense to compare with elevelDB, objective was to assess the cost of organizing the cluster. I was surprised by the difference in performance. I expected to order 20 000 put / sec. Perhaps, RIAK configured incorrect? With these results, you need at least 4 servers with RIAK to

Search index partitioning in Riak-KV

Hello I'm trying to understand how Solr indexes are interact with Riak KV store. Let me explain a bit... The Riak uses sharding per vnode. Each physical node contains several vnodes and data stored there are indexed by Solr. As far as i understood, Solr is not clustered solution, i.e. Solr

Re: Issues with partition distribution across nodes

> This is just a quick reply since this is somewhat a current topic on the > ML. > > On 24 May 2017, at 12:57, Denis Gudtsov <dg.65...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > We have 6-nodes cluster with ring size 128 configured. The problem is > that >

Re: Search index partitioning in Riak-KV

Hello Fred Thank you very much for your explanation. I'm trying to understand how this scheme can work, but need some time... Let me come back to you after some time. Also you're referring to Ryan Zezeski slides, but i can't find it. Could you please share me link if you have it? Thank you.

Riak Search in python: how to extend into complex objects?

I'm using the latest version of riak (0.14.2-1) with the riak-python-client (v. 1.3.0). I want to run the Riak Search example shown in the documentation (https://bitbucket.org/basho/riak-python-client), but the json docs I've added to my bucket are more complex than the example. I.e., instead of

start_clean processes?

Hello! I've faced a problem recently. There are strange processes like ...start_clean which use 100% of CPU. My riak version is 0.14.2. Do you know what is it and what can be done with it? Thank you! ___ riak-users mailing list

Upgrade from 0.14 to 1.1 riak problems!

riak_kv_vnode_master started with riak_core_vnode_master:start_link(riak_kv_vnode, riak_kv_legacy_vnode, riak_kv) at 0.1475.0 exit with reason reached_max_restart_intensity in context shutdown PS. I tuned up all the limits and open ports values... Waiting for you help and thank you! Denis

Merge problems in multi-backend with bitcask...

:23.108 [info] Merged [/var/lib/riak/kv_bitcask/exp_1day/1233142006497949337234359077604363797834693083136,[],[/var/lib/riak/kv_bitcask/exp_1day/1233142006497949337234359077604363797834693083136/1341246813.bitcask.data]] in 0.06311 seconds. Regards, Denis

basho_bench's http raw client constantly crashes

Hi All, Could someone answer is basho_bench's basho_bench_driver_http_raw driver working or not now? I'm trying to benchmark my Riak node using basho_bench, using basho_bench_driver_http_raw driver. But when i'm trying to run it all instances of basho_bench_driver_http_raw clients instantly

Re: basho_bench's http raw client constantly crashes

2013/3/9 Steve Vinoski st...@basho.com Hi Denis, It looks like the raw HTTP driver currently lacks support for delete operations. I've added it on this branch if you want to try it: https://github.com/basho/basho_bench/tree/sbv-add-raw-http-delete --steve Hi Steve, Oh, thank you very

Re: riak (1.3.1), increasing response times over time

Hi Stefan, Yes, we faced same issue after upgrade to 1.3.1. I made rolling restart today - and ... it's a magic - PUT time was dropped from 150 ms to 2 ms! - http://s15.postimg.org/3lrl036yz/put.png Thanks for pointing to right direction, I hope that will be fixed soon - it's not very

Re: Backup/restore progress/ETA?

. Backing up individual bitcask/ring directories and restoring with reip working like a charm, but require complete stop of testing cluster operations. With best regards, Denis. 2013/8/8 Guillermo guille...@cientifico.net Having the same problem. Still running a restore of 2.7 gb. In my

Issues with partition distribution across nodes

Hello We have 6-nodes cluster with ring size 128 configured. The problem is that two partitions has replicas only on two nodes rather than three as required (n_val=3). We have tried several times to clean leveldb and ring directories and then rebuild cluster, but this issue is still present. How