Re: SRMs 640c & 660a

2000-09-29 Thread Jim Cline
At 04:42 PM 9/29/00 +0200, you wrote: >Jim wrote: > > >The hydrostatic stress level is inversely > > proportional to the radius of curvature of the particles. Therefore, the > >Exactly, how did you determine the trend? Have you measured the cell >parameters for different granulometries? This vie

Re: SRMs 640c & 660a

2000-09-29 Thread Brian H. Toby
Luca Lutterotti wrote: > Sorry for the question, but I personally and philosophically don't think we > can measure absolute values.. Hmmm, In that case, I guess you should persuade the USA to change the name of my employer. I disagree. There are such things as fundamental properties and the

Re: SRMs 640c & 660a

2000-09-29 Thread Luca Lutterotti
Jim wrote: >At 11:32 AM 9/28/00 +0200, you wrote: >>Hi Jim, >> >>i) this is what the NIST web site shows under X-ray constants for the >>Silicon lattice parameter: "Concise form 543.102 088(16) x 10-12 m" >>ii) this is shown in your SRM 640c Certificate of Silicon Powder: >>"0.54311946 nm +-0.000

Re: ICSD-for-WWW now outputs Adobe/PDF and Chime/PDB formats

2000-09-29 Thread Alan Hewat
At 21:49 28/09/2000, Armel Le Bail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Good news, the Chime display includes the cell axes if you select that >option. > >Bad news, when saving the PDB file for seeing it at home by Chime, >the cell axes have disappeared. Or maybe I have done something wrong ? Thanks Arme