Re: [Rife-users] Comparing web frameworks : RIFE

2006-03-09 Thread Eddy Young
Looks like you're almost done :-) Is there any reason why you defined the site both programmatically and declaratively? Eddy Geert Bevin wrote: Hi everyone, Simon Brown started a web framework comparison effort a few months ago (http://weblogs.java.net/blog/simongbrown/) and yesterday, a

Re: [Rife-users] Comparing web frameworks : RIFE

2006-03-09 Thread Geert Bevin
Looks like you're almost done :-) Well, I need to write the article ... that's gonna take some effort. Is there any reason why you defined the site both programmatically and declaratively? To shut up those that say that RIFE is 'XML heavy' ;-) I'm still wondering if it's not confusing.

Re: [Rife-users] Comparing web frameworks : RIFE

2006-03-09 Thread Eddy Young
Geert Bevin wrote: Looks like you're almost done :-) Well, I need to write the article ... that's gonna take some effort. How many words for the article? While I'm on the topic, what is the typical length (in words) of a technical book, say, Tapestry in action, for example? (if anyone has

Re: [Rife-users] Comparing web frameworks : RIFE

2006-03-09 Thread Geert Bevin
Not in another archive. I mean, in your article, justify the programmatic declaration as an alternative to XML declaration. While you're at it, throw in Groovy and Janino versions to please the crowd. Yeah, I might do that. -- Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba GTalk: [EMAIL