Looks like you're almost done :-)
Is there any reason why you defined the site both programmatically and
declaratively?
Eddy
Geert Bevin wrote:
Hi everyone,
Simon Brown started a web framework comparison effort a few months ago
(http://weblogs.java.net/blog/simongbrown/) and yesterday, a
Looks like you're almost done :-)
Well, I need to write the article ... that's gonna take some effort.
Is there any reason why you defined the site both programmatically
and declaratively?
To shut up those that say that RIFE is 'XML heavy' ;-)
I'm still wondering if it's not confusing.
Quoting Scotty:
In addition Rife/Crud is a Rails, derailer :-)
Oooh, describe Rife as a Rails-killer and you'll
give birth to a thousand entertaining flamewars !
BR
fred
___
Rife-users mailing list
Rife-users@uwyn.com
Geert Bevin wrote:
Looks like you're almost done :-)
Well, I need to write the article ... that's gonna take some effort.
How many words for the article? While I'm on the topic, what is the
typical length (in words) of a technical book, say, Tapestry in action,
for example? (if anyone has
Not in another archive. I mean, in your article, justify the
programmatic declaration as an alternative to XML declaration.
While you're at it, throw in Groovy and Janino versions to please
the crowd.
Yeah, I might do that.
--
Geert Bevin Uwyn bvba GTalk: [EMAIL
I had a few problems the last time I tried this, so I'm representing
the session on the 17th.
cheers,
Emmanuel
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pilgrim, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar 9, 2006 5:49 PM
Subject: [ANN] JAVAWUG BOF XVI / Friday 3rd March 2006 @ 19:00 /
Oracle Ci ty of
Thanks a lot Emmanuel,
I included it in the calendar and announced it on the rifers.org news.
On 9-mrt-06, at 19:01, Emmanuel Okyere wrote:
I had a few problems the last time I tried this, so I'm representing
the session on the 17th.
cheers,
Emmanuel
-- Forwarded message --
