I hope that, if I go ahead with this, I'll be able to get feedback on
requirements. The basic concept, as I understand it, is to make a
JavaSpace go on operating correctly even in the face of a server failure.
Do you need to bring in a new server to replace a failed server, to
maintain the sam
+1. The lack of partitioning and fault-tolerance is exactly what's
keeping my current employer from using Outrigger, though they'd love
to. They do use Jini, though, so they'd be an easy sell if such a
thing were available.
-jeff
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> What d
On 2/9/2011 7:41 AM, Brian Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I don't really know enough about River yet to contribute to a lot of the
futures discussions. On the other hand, I can track down and fix bugs, and
doing so helps me learn about more areas.
..
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I don't really know enough about River yet to contribute to a lot of the
> futures discussions. On the other hand, I can track down and fix bugs, and
> doing so helps me learn about more areas.
>
I'm not so sure Patricia. I think you're s
I don't really know enough about River yet to contribute to a lot of the
futures discussions. On the other hand, I can track down and fix bugs,
and doing so helps me learn about more areas.
I think I'm almost done with the outrigger QA failures I've been working on.
Any opinions on what I sho