On 09/15/2010 03:52 PM, Damon Courtney wrote:
I'm not sure I know where to go either. 0-] I'm just working with it and
starting to find places where it could be improved, that's all. I think you're
right about getting new users and new energy, but not a damn one of us knows
how to do that.
Am 15.09.2010 17:41, schrieb Rob Sciuk:
> To sum up: Rivet must adopt an elegant frame work architecture which
> makes it dead simple to develop compelling platform agnostic rich
> multi-media web applications. That's all.
Maybee, the speech of Arnulf Wiedemann at TCLConf will show one of those.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Damon Courtney wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:52:26 -0500
From: Damon Courtney
To: Rivet_dev
Subject: Re: Moving forward
I think one of the biggest advances in the potential for the use of
Rivet by others has been the creation of a Linux RPM and a FreeBSD port
of
> I think one of the biggest advances in the potential for the use of Rivet by
> others has been the creation of a Linux RPM and a FreeBSD port of Rivet 2.0.
>
> While I enthusiastically welcome further Rivet development, successful
> efforts to grow the user base will yield more energy and more
> Giving as granted we are using Tcl8.5 from now on we can obviously expand,
> reform and/or complement commands and packages. I'm sure Damon is thinking
> of our database access module for example. Also smaller databases (headers,
> cookies, forms, environment) may benefit of dicts to improv
Sounds good, Massimo.
I think one of the biggest advances in the potential for the use of Rivet by
others has been the creation of a Linux RPM and a FreeBSD port of Rivet 2.0.
While I enthusiastically welcome further Rivet development, successful efforts
to grow the user base will yield more en
Just of couple of thoughts about Damon's proposal to drop 8.4 support
for good.
Giving as granted we are using Tcl8.5 from now on we can obviously
expand, reform and/or complement commands and packages. I'm sure Damon
is thinking of our database access module for example. Also smaller
da
Hi Harald,
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 at 11:58, Harald Oehlmann wrote:
Reinhard, any comments ?
for openSUSE (and that's the only one I can speak for) I see no
problem in dropping support for 8.4 from Rivet.
cu
Reinhard
Thank you discussing about dropping tcl 8.4.
The rpm packets at opensuse depend for the following distribution on:
CentOS 5: 8.4
RHEL 5: 8.4
OpenSuSE 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, Factory: 8.5
SLE 11: 8.5
So the packets for CentOS and RHEL will not build any more.
By the way, Massimo, still no advertisment
I agree
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:27:43 -0500, Damon Courtney wrote
> I think it's time to drop support for Tcl 8.4 in the next release.
> We've got 2.0.1 out there that works with 8.4, but 8.4 is getting
> long in the tooth and will soon be EOL'd. I'm already running
> everything on 8.6, and Kar
10 matches
Mail list logo
