[Rkhunter-users] rkhunter warnings, maybe yum issues?

Good evening, I don't know if these are properly rkhunter questions, yum questions, or F-20 questions, so I'm posting to both lists. Last Monday, I updated my 64-bit system from Fedora-19 to Fedora-20. Several minutes ago, I updated Fedora-20 by doing yum update. I then did rkhunter

Re: [Rkhunter-users] rkhunter warnings, maybe yum issues?

Frank asks: What is your yum update schedule? I run yum update manually every Wednesday evening. Ed says: See... http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-readahead-replay.service.html ok. Thank-you, Ed. But / seems like a strange place to put that file. It can spook

Re: [Rkhunter-users] 15 suspect files.

one cleanly. How do I get this behavior? thanks, Bill. On 04/21/2016 02:15 PM, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, William wrote: > >> I just finished the weekly Fedora-23 patches and scans. The rkhunter >> scan warned on 15 files: >> ... >&

Re: [Rkhunter-users] 15 suspect files. [CLOSED]

I thank Nerijus, G.W., and John for their help. > Take a look in the config file at the PKGMGR option. For Fedora, set it to RPM (and then run 'rkhunter --propupd'). PKGMGR was already correctly set in both configuration files. Using the "--propupd" option did clear the warnings. Bill.

Re: [Rkhunter-users] hidden process false positives

On 03/11/2010 10:46 PM, unsp...@hushmail.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:24 +0100 William Maddler n...@maddler.net wrote: since about a week I'm getting alerts about hidden processes found on my system (Debian 5.0 stable 32bit). I've just found that reported PIDs are Postfix (2.5.5

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Update for 1.3.8

Have you tried configuring BINDIR in rkhunter.conf? ;) On 17/11/2010 14:58, Roberto wrote: I havenot BINDIR, only commented one. However I have ./ in my PATH environment var, it's not allowed by new rkhunter? Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone On 17/11/2010, at 14:26, William

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Update for 1.3.8

On 17/11/2010 15:09, John Horne wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:26 +0100, William Maddler wrote: Hint: tried looking at actual BINDIR configuration? ;) On 17/11/2010 13:55, Roberto wrote: Hello After install the new 1.3.8 version I get this: Invalid BINDIR configuration option: Invalid

Re: [Rkhunter-users] puzzling error messages. [SOLVED]

For the past few weeks, I've been running rkhunter with no problems.  But this morning, I get this bash.1[~]: rkhunter --update Invalid BINDIR configuration option: Invalid directory found: . Invalid BINDIR configuration option: Invalid directory found: . bash.2[~]: I get the same thing

Re: [Rkhunter-users] SSH backdoor non detected by RKH

and sshd processes. Here, the infection neither modifies the binaries of the service which has been compromised, nor does it restart the service which has been affected. Looks like something very similar to that. Bye William - Original Message - From: Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com Cc

[Rkhunter-users] off-line support request.

Good morning, I'm on a home system; I have no sys.admin training or experience.  I could use some help using rkhunter.  I'd like to handle this off-line.  May I?  If yes, how? thanks, Bill. -- LIMITED TIME SALE - Full

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warning on http listening on network

That message refer to packet capture not to normal listening. So said: are you sure that httpd is the legit one? If so, that could be something similar to http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/23104, perhaps. W. - Original Message - From: absolutely