Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-12 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/11/2009, John Horne (john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk) wrote: > At that time the Linux os_specific test did just the one test, so > disabling 'os_specific' was valid at that time. Gotcha... thanks again... -- Come build wi

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-11 Thread John Horne
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 18:00 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 10/11/2009 5:30 PM, John Horne wrote: > >> I found a recommendation to disable the 'os_specific' check in > >> DISABLED_TESTS in rkhunter.conf to fix this > > > The config file provided by us makes no such recommendation. > > Sorry, I was n

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/11/2009 5:30 PM, John Horne wrote: >> I found a recommendation to disable the 'os_specific' check in >> DISABLED_TESTS in rkhunter.conf to fix this > The config file provided by us makes no such recommendation. Sorry, I was not clear... the recommendation I found was while googling... Heh

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-11 Thread John Horne
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:37 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > I found a recommendation to disable the 'os_specific' check in > DISABLED_TESTS in rkhunter.conf to fix this > The config file provided by us makes no such recommendation. > , but, what other tests/checks are being disabled by this? Or is it