[Rkhunter-users] Broken link on FAQ page

2009-10-11 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, I just wanted to report a broken link on the sourceforge FAQ page: https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=35179group_id=155034 3.1) Rootkit Hunter tells me there is something wrong with my system. What do I do? A. Prior to any incident it is recommended that you have

[Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-11 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, New to rkhunter, just installed 1.3.4 and had a question. On the first run I had some of the normal false positives and fixed them (whitelisted the 3 commands that are replaced by scripts on my system (normal), and whitelisted the hidden .udev directory), but I want to be sure about what

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/11/2009 5:30 PM, John Horne wrote: I found a recommendation to disable the 'os_specific' check in DISABLED_TESTS in rkhunter.conf to fix this The config file provided by us makes no such recommendation. Sorry, I was not clear... the recommendation I found was while googling... Heh -

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Question re: os_specific check

2009-10-12 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/11/2009, John Horne (john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk) wrote: At that time the Linux os_specific test did just the one test, so disabling 'os_specific' was valid at that time. Gotcha... thanks again... -- Come build

[Rkhunter-users] Which tests do you enable?

2009-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl
Hi everyone, I'm still a bit new to rkhunter. I've been running the apps test ever since I installed rkhunter, and the only time I got a hit was after updating the core tools, which makes sense, since those executables are updated, and a quick --propupd fixes it. I also recently had a hit on

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Which tests do you enable?

2009-12-03 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/2/2009 2:11 PM, John Horne wrote: Now, I am only apparently running two tests: File properties, and rootkits. You need to check your config file to see what tests have been disabled. Well, like I said before, I'm new to rkhunter, so I basically just left it at the defaults. I'm using

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Which tests do you enable?

2009-12-03 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/3/2009, Brian McKee (m...@map-heb.com) wrote: Look at the --cronjob option, which implies the --nocolors option. Ah... cool, thanks. :) -- Best regards, Charles Marcus I.T. Director Media Brokers International, Inc. 678.514.6200 x224 678.514.6299 fax

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Which tests do you enable?

2009-12-04 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/3/2009 5:56 PM, John Horne wrote: DISABLE_TESTS=apps deleted_files hidden_procs loaded_modules packet_cap_apps suspscan These are the default supplied disabled tests (apart from apps). So, it means you are running the usual tests. snip I would say leave things as they are. You seem

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Added --nocolor option, same squares in summary output

2009-12-04 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/4/2009 3:25 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: # Default options - more options may be added depending on the # configuration variables you set below # --cronjob implies -c, --nocolor, --sk RKHUNTER_OPTS=--nocolor --cronjob --summary Oh - I also tried it with --nocolors AFTER --cronjob RKHUNTER_OPTS

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Weird timing - possible rootkit?

2009-12-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/4/2009 7:09 PM, unsp...@hushmail.com wrote: Warning: Network TCP port 2006 is being used by /usr/sbin/couriertls. Possible rootkit: CB Rootkit or w00tkit Rootkit SSH server Netstat -tulnap shows a whole bunch of similar connections open, so I think this is normal? Question then is why

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Added --nocolor option, same squares in summary output

2009-12-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/5/2009, John Horne (john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk) wrote: You need to change the second line to 'rkhunter --update --nocolors'. BINGO. Thanks John, that did the trick. :) -- Best regards, Charles -- Join us

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Weird timing - possible rootkit?

2009-12-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/5/2009, John Horne (john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk) wrote: Again - is there anything special about port 2006 that makes rkhunter single it out? Yes, it is known to be used by the CB and w00tkit rootkits. That's why RKH is warning you about it. Ah, ok, now that makes sense. Thinking about

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Weird timing - possible rootkit?

2009-12-05 Thread Tanstaafl
On 12/5/2009, John Horne (john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk) wrote: You can either whitelist the port itself (PORT_WHITELIST=TCP:2006), or whitelist a particular application to use known bad ports (PORT_WHITELIST=couriertls). Ok, after a really bizarre ritual called 'reading the comments', I

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-16 Thread Tanstaafl
Thanks for the response John... On 2010-05-15 4:41 PM, John Horne wrote: On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 11:55 -0400, Charles wrote: Ok, 1.3.4 has been running daily for months, with no warnings. I just updated to 1.3.6, and got a bunch or warnings... I'm hoping these are just a result of the upgrade,

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-17 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-17 5:19 PM, John Horne wrote: On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 15:11 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: You can either whitelist the files or disable the 'immutable' test completely. I don't mind disabling the test completely if it isn't very useful (this is what I was told about the 'applications

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-17 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-17 5:23 PM, John Horne wrote: No. That just removes them from the file properties check. They will still be reported as infected. See Helmut Hullen's answer: I had solved the Xzibit warnings with RTKT_FILE_WHITELIST=/etc/init.d/boot.local In your case use:

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-18 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-17 6:25 PM, John Horne wrote: On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 17:36 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: Ok - so, you're saying this (the 'immutable' test) is a *new* test that didn't exist in 1.3.4? Remember, 1.3.4 was running for many months without ever having one warning like this. No. The test has

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-19 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-18 3:58 PM, John Horne wrote: On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 08:52 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: In my config file, for both 1.3.4 and now for 1.3.6, I had/have: ENABLE_TESTS=all DISABLE_TESTS=apps deleted_files hidden_procs loaded_modules packet_cap_apps suspscan So, with this config, should

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-19 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-19 6:44 AM, John Horne wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 06:25 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: Double hmmm since ianap and am not comfortable trying to debug this myself, I guess I'm off to the gentoo forums to see if anyone there can answer this... All you have to do is run RKH

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-19 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-19 8:39 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: I googled how to do that, but what I balked at was installing both versions side by side... It's quite simple! Wow... thanks Helmut! That looks simple enough that even I can do it... ;) Ooops - now I need the 1.3.4 version, and can't find it on the

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-19 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-19 8:58 AM, John Horne wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 08:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: Could someone point me to an official download link for 1.3.4? I have a copy of 1.3.4 at home, will email it to you later today unless someone else replies with a copy. Cool, thanks John

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Warnings after update from 1.3.4 to 1.3.6

2010-05-19 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-05-19 10:25 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: The machine is offline from 20 o'clock to 5 o'clock UTC. You have more than 5 hours from now! Thanks Helmut, I got it... :) --

[Rkhunter-users] rkhunter --propupd not working?

2011-06-27 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, I have had rkhunter installed for a long time, been working well, system was reporting clean... I installed a lot of system updates (gentoo linux), then the next morning, got a report about 6 files whose properties had changed, and I realized I forgot to run --propupd command, so I did -

Re: [Rkhunter-users] rkhunter --propupd not working?

2011-06-27 Thread Tanstaafl
Thanks for the help John... On 2011-06-27 10:57 AM, John Horne wrote: What version of rkhunter are you using? 1.3.8 Also can you show us the full log entry for one of the files with a warning - that is, showing which file properties have changed? [09:57:04] /usr/bin/logger

Re: [Rkhunter-users] rkhunter --propupd not working?

2011-06-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-06-30 3:36 PM, John Horne wrote: You'll need to check your system - perhaps with something like 'locate' - to see if RKH has been installed more than once. Nope, there's only one rkhunter.dat: myhost : Thu Jun 30, 16:03:07 : ~ # locate rkhunter.dat /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat

Re: [Rkhunter-users] rkhunter --propupd not working?

2011-07-01 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-07-01 9:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: Ok - but again, I ran --propupd, and got the email warning about the same 6 files, then went and grabbed the current .log and .log.old files... Ok, I'm really not stupid, I promise, just had tunnel vision I guess... I was running it from the cron

[Rkhunter-users] Warning about /usr/sbin/rkhunter file after gentoo updates...

2011-09-21 Thread Tanstaafl
Hi all, After a lot of updates on my gentoo system - one of which included a REBUILD of rkhunter - and *after* running --propupd, I'm getting the following Warning (this is the only one): [07:40:01] /usr/sbin/rkhunter [ Warning ] [07:40:01] Warning: The command

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Trojaned SSHD

2014-03-11 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/11/2014 11:34 AM, Wally wnow...@gmail.com wrote: Warning: Checking for possible rootkit strings[ Warning ]Found string 'aion' in file '/usr/sbin/sshd'. Possible rootkit: Trojaned SSH daemon $ strings sshd | grep aion Vector Permutaion AES for x86_64/SSSE3, Mike Hamburg (Stanford

[Rkhunter-users] Default .conf file minor comment typo

2014-10-02 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, Almost not worth mentioning, but... Fyi, I just updated to 1.4.2 on one of my gentoo systems, and noted a typo in the comments... # The default value is '1024000'. # #SUSPSCAN_MAXSIZE=1024 There is one less zero in the comment for the default value than there should be... ;)

Re: [Rkhunter-users] Default .conf file minor comment typo

2014-10-02 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/2/2014 7:14 AM, John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 06:35 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: Hello, Almost not worth mentioning, but... Fyi, I just updated to 1.4.2 on one of my gentoo systems, and noted a typo in the comments... # The default value is '1024000

[Rkhunter-users] Recent Gentoo update, warnings on /bin/egrep and /bin/fgrep

2015-01-26 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, Been on rkhunter 1.4.2 for a while, no changes made to its config file, runs nightly without any warnings... I recently did some Gentoo updates after almost 2 months of no updates (was out of town), and now, even after running --propupd, I continut to get these warnings: # grep Warning