Hi,
On Friday 28 November 2014 01:18:53 Stefan Rödiger wrote:
My vote: alphabetical sorting only within each group
ok, I did that (and if we don't like it, it will be easy to remove the
alphabetical sorting).
Now a lot depends on coming up with a sensible grouping. We'll have to see
about that. Here are some details of the current implementation:
- You can define groups inside any menu like this:
group id=somegroup/
- If you want the group to be separated from other entries, use:
group id=somegroup separated=true/
- Entries, menus, and groups can be appended to a specified group, using:
entry component=... group=somegroup/
- In fact, it is also possible to define groups (without separator lines)
implicitly:
entry component=first group=a/
entry component=third/
entry component=second group=a/
- Group names are specific to each menu. Group a in menu Data does not
conflict with group a in menu Analysis, for example.
- I believe, the most common use case is defining groups at the top, or at the
bottom of a menu. For this, there are pre-defined groups top and bottom in
each menu.
- Entries within each group are sorted, alphabetically. Groups appear in the
order of declaration (unless appended to another group, of course).
- Menus and entries without group specification logically from a group (),
too.
Please experiment with this, if you care. As long as this is not released, it
will be easily possible to change details. Afterwards that may be more
difficult.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
RKWard-devel mailing list
RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
