I found two quirks after the upgrade.
(1) Comments were disabled at the global level. Caused a minor mystery,
but I did manage to resolve it.
(2) The upgrade left the server enabled for new user registration
although I had it disabled before the upgrade. Not sure why this
happened. This
Wow. Lots of activity in Subversion and progress on Roller 2.1
yesterday:
* Allen and Matt committed code to replace Container Managed
Authentication with Acegi.
Looks good. I guess we need to adjust the installation docs too.
Roller now includes spring.jar. Hmm...
* Allen committed a
I haven't got any comment e-mails from my site since I upgraded to
Roller 2.0. I have everything configured correctly AFAIK. The UI has
the appropriate boxes checked in my settings, as well as the server
settings.
Matt
I experienced #1 in my failed upgrade attempt, but not #2.
Matt
On 11/29/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found two quirks after the upgrade.
(1) Comments were disabled at the global level. Caused a minor mystery,
but I did manage to resolve it.
(2) The upgrade left the server
Hmmm ... If you guys still have log files from when you first deployed 2.0 it
should have an INFO line indicating that the new runtime property
users.comments.enabled was added with a value of true. See if you can
track that down.
I double checked the runtime config defs file and the default
On 11/29/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a similar problem while testing.
The two things to check are: (1) Make sure the web.xml doesn't have the
mail session resource commented. (2) Make sure you don't have a
duplicate copies of mail.jar and activation.jar in both Tomcat's
I'm not sure I understand what functionality you guys are talking about. Is
this something that is found on weblog pages? or on the editor/admin UI?
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:24, Dave Johnson wrote:
That one slipped through the cracks.
There's a next-prev macro that works on
gotcha. definitely seems like something we should continue to have.
i will admit though, that i think our weblog entry pagification is a bit quirky
and messed up. i don't use it, so it doesn't bother me much, but i know of 2
things that i've noted in the past.
1. the next/previous links
On Nov 29, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
gotcha. definitely seems like something we should continue to have.
Yep, we need some way to page back in time.
i will admit though, that i think our weblog entry pagification is a
bit quirky and messed up. i don't use it, so it doesn't
Hi, this is my first post on the roller lists.
I have a request related to paging back to previous blog
posts using the calendar.
Do not provide a link back to the previous month/day/year if
you are beyond the blogs first post and of course don't link
to a future month/year.
This prevents bots
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 12:50, Dave Johnson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
gotcha. definitely seems like something we should continue to have.
Yep, we need some way to page back in time.
i will admit though, that i think our weblog entry pagification is a
On Nov 29, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 12:50, Dave Johnson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
1. the next/previous links don't work properly for permalinks.
previous works, but next always goes to the most recent entry.
That's how
I think you could certainly argue that we should provide some way for
bloggers to have a page that shows XX entries in a row starting at entry YY,
but when do people really want that functionality?
The Front Page and Group Blogs are the two cases where we may need
pagination. Most other
13 matches
Mail list logo
