that's fine with me.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 22:13, Matt Raible wrote:
Should we upgrade Acegi to 1.0.0-RC1 before we do a 2.1 release? It's
probably a good idea to do it sooner than later, especially since they
changed their package names. I've done the upgrade in my workspace -
I only see this partially working. I get switching from http - https, but it
never switches back to http.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 21:47, Matt Raible wrote:
This seems to work - we might want to specify 80/443 and 8080/8443 as
the defaults and point users to security.xml if they'd
It worked for me on login. What ports are you using? Please provide
the steps to reproduce and I'll try to do so.
Matt
On 1/24/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only see this partially working. I get switching from http - https, but
it never switches back to http.
-- Allen
Well, it works if all you do is start in http and login, but it doesn't
actually enforce the proper schemes. i.e. try hitting the root page of the app
under https and you'll see that it won't redirect you back to http.
A typical example would be to hit the login link and get to the login page
Not everybody (hi Anil!) agrees that Open Document format is the
right format for the Installation Guide, but I decided to go out on a
limb and convert it from wiki to ODT -- a desperate measure to
convince the doubters that I am right.
I also updated the install guide content for 2.1
On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 1/24/06, Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think the wiki is great for collaborative document
development -- things like proposals, FAQ files and up-to-the minute
docs such as release notes. But for formal documents like the
I understand your points about non-technical people collaborating on docs,
Dave, but I would expect some pushback. People are likely to feel that
documentation for ASF projects should not be used to promote other agendas.
Has anyone approached Forrest (http://forrest.apache.org) about being able
On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I understand your points about non-technical people collaborating
on docs,
Dave, but I would expect some pushback. People are likely to feel
that
documentation for ASF projects should not be used to promote other
agendas.
I don't
Alright, well I've this again and I still can't get it to work, so unless
someone else can tackle this then I think the only alternative is to bring back
the old SchemeEnforcementFilter and not use Acegi's scheme switching.
-- Allen
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:55, Allen Gilliland wrote:
Well,
I'll attempt to fix this tonight.
Matt
On 1/24/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it works if all you do is start in http and login, but it doesn't
actually enforce the proper schemes. i.e. try hitting the root page of the
app under https and you'll see that it won't
To throw in my view:
I like the pdf's; and I think the idea of using a more easily
approachable tool like OpenDocuments is definitely worth
experimentation from the point of view of the ASF. It's easy to edit
and work on - unlike most of the other documentation tools we have
which are powerful
On 1/24/06, David M Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I understand your points about non-technical people collaborating
on docs,
Dave, but I would expect some pushback. People are likely to feel
that
documentation for ASF projects
Dave,
Yes, getting non-technical people to collaborate is good. I am simply
pointing out that there would also be somewhat inevitable claims that we are
promoting the use of Open Office, and its formats, by forcing anyone wanting
to collaborate to acquire that product, rather than be able to use
FWIW, I'd prefer to use an editor over XML any day. But that's just
me - from an author point of view. Of course, I also enjoy using
JSPWiki for documentation. ;-)
Matt
On 1/24/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Yes, getting non-technical people to collaborate is good. I am
Dave,
After I sent that response I realized what you meant by agenda.
You're saying that ASF people will think I want to use Open Office
because Sun told me to.
Actually, I had not thought of it that way at all. I was commenting on just
the general perception that someone could believe that
On Jan 24, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
After I sent that response I realized what you meant by agenda.
You're saying that ASF people will think I want to use Open Office
because Sun told me to.
Actually, I had not thought of it that way at all. I was
commenting on just
the
On 1/24/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it works if all you do is start in http and login, but it doesn't
actually enforce the proper schemes. i.e. try hitting the root page of the
app under https and you'll see that it won't redirect you back to http.
A typical example
17 matches
Mail list logo
