On 6/8/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious, what open source webapps have you looked at that use
this standard directory structure?
hmmm, well there's these ...
apache-ant-1.6.3/
commons-httpclient-2.0.2/
commons-lang-2.1/
hibernate-3.0/
jakarta-jmeter-2.0.3/
It used to be possible, before the big configuration migration.
Allen was very consciencious about migrating settings so perhaps this
is still possible?
I'm not familiar with the new configuration mechanism, though.
On 5/23/06, David M Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 8:10
Until such an option as Allen describes, you should be able to specify
the no op decorator (if it still exists, under
/WEB-INF/classes/themes) at the top of your page with:
#set( $decorator = /themes/noop_decorator.vm )
If you cannot point to the default decorators, create your own
On 5/3/06, John Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
I like them if they indicate content type and not the implementation.
Implementation to me means advertizing the tool used to make a content
type and is totally irrelevant to a URL: php, jsp, asp etc. html is a
content type.
I find this
Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it
myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time trying to build an
interface without relying on javascript (something I am loath to do),
and I never could figure out how to get it to ignore html tags.
Lance
On 4/17/06,
/06, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on ditching it. we can definitely find something better.
-- Allen
Lance Lavandowska wrote:
Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it
myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time trying to build
FCKeditor is licensed LGPL.
That and not everyone deploys on a *nix box.
On 4/17/06, Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have played around with FCKeditor and its spellchecker.
It has nice integration using javascript with SpellerPages (aspell).
There is both a PHP and Perl CGI server
is the UI code, don't we have the rest?
-Elias
Allen Gilliland wrote:
+1 on ditching it. we can definitely find something better.
-- Allen
Lance Lavandowska wrote:
Kill the jazzy spell-checker. I've never been terribly happy with it
myself, and I integrated it. I had a horrible time
hot diggety! It looks like it (JaSpell) actually has it's own
SpellChecker as well as the aspell interface (aspell is 'just' a
sanity checker?).
thanks for finding that stuff, I rarely enjoy being proved wrong, but
I'll make an exception in this case.
On 4/17/06, Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL
I'm with Matt on this, I'd rather Roller didn't encourage summary feeds.
On 4/12/06, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds good - but would we *have* to use it? I'd like an option to
disable it and keep the current system. This seems like it might lead
to shorter summary type RSS
I have to say that I am coming around to Allen's point, particularly
about support. If we release code that supports APP 0.8 are we
binding ourselves to supporting that version for any length of time?
That is, will there be any clients that may not move to 1.0, or may do
so at a slower pace than
Dave and I had a bit of a commit war, where he commented it out, I
uncommented it,
Eventually he won. I'm not certain, but I think his concerns were
server load and/or that the iframe I was using was unattractive
(though I did my best to make it look nice).
My 2 bits, obviously, suggest
The old configuration had a place for listing which editors to make
available to users (I haven't upgraded since before 1.0) and I don't
recall you removing this when you rewrote the configuration bits.
On the 2 sections: the editors are really just replacements for the
textarea that holds the
Don't forget .vm files! You might want to include .jspf too, though I
don't know if there are any anymore (it's been a long while since I
created a few of those and someone else may have got rid of them).
On 12/29/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that there were a few unused
I would say fix it if you are editing the code, but don't seek them
out to change.
Of course, I have no C habit's to change.
On 12/29/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally I ignore coding style and just match the style of the file
I'm editing, or the package I'm adding a class
On 11/14/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
findbugs = ?? is this a must? how do we use it?
I'd like to kill this one soon if possible. Seems unnecessary.
I introduced FindBugs, but if no one is using it, feel free to remove it.
+1
On 9/15/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Great!
- Original Message -
From: Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: roller-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Elias Torres as a committer?
+1 for Sun.
On 9/14/05, Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a lot of time to create another color-scheme right now and
I need to start making some screenshots for the docs, so I'm calling a
vote on the default color scheme for 2.0:
Tan votes so far:
Matt +1
Dave +1
+1, but I would add to Anil's second note that daily would be too
frequent for a low traffic site (such as mine). But I rather like
day-based logs in any case.
Lance
On 8/31/05, Anil Gangolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0. A couple of notes:
1) When I start and debug via IDEA, I do watch
On 8/21/05, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was trying to use your cross-database tools (properties file) to add
support for DB2 in Roller and I found a couple of things you might
want to know. BTW, I'm no DB expert.
- DB2 has a (seems-to-me) hard limit on identifier
On 8/16/05, Lance Lavandowska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/16/05, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we could write RewriteRules in Apache that translated these for
example:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/Weblog?catname=General into
http://www.jroller.com/static-content
On 8/18/05, Nitin Shirke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone implemented a way to allow the administrator to delete some
of the comments?
The individual blog owner can delete comments for a particular post in
the Edit Weblog window (at the bottom). There is no facility for the
Roller Admin
Ugh, the useless Velocity exception stacktrace. My best guess is that
something has a null timestamp value. You might want to alter your
velocimacros to elimate date formatting (just print it raw) and see
what that reveals.
Lance
On 8/18/05, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I have a
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Has anyone checked to see if every Theme's Weblog template has an
RSS/Atom autodiscovery link?
Lance
On 8/17/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a new macro that i'd like to throw into the weblog.vm file. It
displays an html comment which is
I'm surprised Dave has chimed in on the not renamable part, as he
renamed his Weblog page (I haven't looked to see if he changed it
back).
Lance
On 8/17/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Lance had some good thoughts about how the decorator works, but nobody
else has chimed in
On 8/16/05, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we could write RewriteRules in Apache that translated these for example:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/Weblog?catname=General into
http://www.jroller.com/static-content/fate/general/index.html
Suggestion: write the static version to
apply decorator?, or some other
way to toggle it on/off for a given template.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 10:53, Lance Lavandowska wrote:
The decorator is not necessarily an all-or-nothing proposal, you can
specify the decorator to be used in each page template (you'll have to
find
IIRC, Basic is the only Theme that actually uses a real decorator.
But your point that it may be in use elsewhere is valid (in fact, I
use it in the pages I added to my Currency-themed site). Since no-one
today is using shared templates I would suggest that we can still
alter the default
Just to further the brain-experiment, what does it look like when you
add the decorator to this list:
---
Weblog, Weblog, Weblog, check (decorator applied), edit link, (required)
_css, local.css, site css, empty (no decorator), edit link, (required)
_decorator, decorator, decorator, empty (no
I haven't had a chance to read the proposal yet, but why not extend
this to Bookmarks too? Then we'd have even more par with del.icio.us.
Lance
On 7/6/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, while i've been lounging around enjoying my vacation and watching
the Tour De France i've
- From: Lance Lavandowska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: roller-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: velocity context cleanup
On 6/29/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Data.remove() is available to users (try $website.remove
On 6/29/05, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Data.remove() is available to users (try $website.remove() in a template)
This method should probably be removed from the classes. While I
think even POJOs should contain some business logic, I don't feel that
persistence-related methods
32 matches
Mail list logo
