[Citadel Development] Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. 7bfc9ea85ba1146f09982b9616eaf82b54321ea4

2011-07-12 Thread samjam
On 12/07/11 14:51, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: No, we just pull the top-level headers and we do not fetch the message body. Do we still do the security check to make sure the message is in the room, so we can't used this to peek at arbitrary messages? Sam

[Citadel Development] Re:

2011-07-11 Thread samjam
On 11/07/11 14:04, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: Actually, I'm in the process of ripping out the *new* way too. The buttons for Reply, ReplyQuoted, and Forward need to carry a whole lot of information (subject, references, recipients) out to the browser and then back in through a URL submission,

[Citadel Development] SMTP timeout

2011-06-29 Thread samjam
My children's school's SMTP server waits 120 seconds before responding with a 250 Recipient OK during SMTP. The server is reports itself as Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 4.2.2-FCS Queuing Funnily if the connection is aborted after 60 seconds, the 250 response comes back immediately.

[Citadel Development] Re: bugs and inconsistencies ; documentation

2011-05-16 Thread samjam
On 15/05/11 16:06, dothebart wrote: /sendcommand: started (pid=28583) running in 504/ /Attaching to server.../ /potzblitz Citadel server ready./ /Authenticated as an internal program./ /LPRM/ /100 Publiic rooms:/ /Lobby|2|0|0|0|422|0|0|1302842947|/ /testbcc|2|0|64|16|422|0|1|1305378302|/

[Citadel Development] Re: Embargoed: multiple jabber servers vulnerable to denial of service

2011-05-05 Thread samjam
On 05/05/11 12:46, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: I'm willing to hold off on releasing our own security alert, and even perhaps waiting until 0 Day to release an updated version of the software. What I'm *not* willing to do, is to stop using our source code repository the way it was intended because

[Citadel Development] Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. 2063519eeba1e97c13732f061faea42556e9488b

2011-04-06 Thread samjam
On 06/04/11 10:38, dothebart wrote: Di Apr 05 2011 12:39:14 EDTvon ajc a...@uncensored.citadel.org Betreff: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. 2063519eeba1e97c13732f061faea42556e9488b Push to the project citadel.org : The branch, master has been updated via

[Citadel Development] Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. e432540ab02282396bf87eafde6a1698819912ff

2011-01-28 Thread samjam
On 27/01/11 23:25, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: Ok. This solves the problem of I can request arbitrary msgnums and the server will give them to me whether or not they exist in a room to which I have access -- which was only a minor nuisance before, but with Citadel sites being exposed to the

[Citadel Development] 303 Status response

2011-01-21 Thread samjam
W3C seem to have updated RCS's inlreation to the meaning and use of the HTTP 302 and 303 status responses: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html It looks like whether or not 302 or 303 is used should possible depend on the level of HTTP in the request. I would therefore

[Citadel Development] Re: Message security

2011-01-19 Thread samjam
On 18/01/11 16:10, dothebart wrote: because of the use of cookie based authentication you can't do that with one browser. I did do it. if you're able to reproduce this with two browsers (run a chrome and a firefox) and we have a problem. Since the client knows the room its in,

[Citadel Development] Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. e396526ea63700bee599f96fc03e72fc8ea503c2

2011-01-11 Thread samjam
On 11/01/11 05:09, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: It's been a productive evening. :) Wiki now works and looks good, even in guest mode. Thanks very much. I'll give it a go. I'll give guest mode a go too, I've never tried that yet. Sam

[Citadel Development] Re: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. e396526ea63700bee599f96fc03e72fc8ea503c2

2011-01-11 Thread samjam
On 11/01/11 12:38, samjam wrote: On 11/01/11 05:09, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: It's been a productive evening. :) Wiki now works and looks good, even in guest mode. Thanks very much. I'll give it a go. Every time I edit a page, my signature get's added automatically to the top

[Citadel Development] Add, Change or Delete floors

2011-01-07 Thread samjam
On yesterdays HEAD I can't create floors - the Add, Change or Delete floors link from advanced goes to /webcit/display_floorconfig which actually displays the Advanced menu and not any kind of floor config menu. Sam

[Citadel Development] webcit create new room broken

2011-01-01 Thread samjam
The create new room page in webcit is broken on master HEAD The main form to provide room details is permanently scrolled to the bottom and has no scroll-bars, so I can't see anything above the Type of room and so can't enter these details.

[Citadel Development] wiki still does nothing

2011-01-01 Thread samjam
With master HEAD I create a new wiki room. When viewing, I see this message: *There is no page called 'home' here.* Select the 'Edit this page' link in the room banner if you would like to create this page. If I select edit, and save the page, I still see the same message. No home page is

[Citadel Development] Re: installation failed

2010-11-18 Thread samjam
On 17/11/10 20:17, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: how to install citadel on centos 5 i did easy install, Log in as root and enter the following command: rm -rf / Don't do that. I'm guessing that IGnatius was just over-tired. If you are running roundcube, then you are probably running

[Citadel Development] Re: (no subject)

2010-11-17 Thread samjam
On 16/11/10 22:29, dothebart wrote: Ok, most of the needed bugfixes were cherry-picked into stable-78x. this one i'd like to discuss first, 'caus its a little more intrusive then the other ones; its changes are primarily intended to get a SMTP client timeout:

[Citadel Development] [PATCH] Remove space between floor names for IMAP compliance

2010-10-22 Thread samjam
Otherwise causes failures with strict com.sun.mail.imap, causing: Caused by: javax.mail.MessagingException: Missing '(' at start of Namespace; nested exception is: com.sun.mail.iap.ProtocolException: Missing '(' at start of Namespace at

[Citadel Development] Loading directly from getsatisfaction

2010-09-29 Thread samjam
Why are the new templates loading css direct from getsatisfaction? Warning: Unknown property 'border-radius'.  Declaration dropped.Source File: http://assets1.getsatisfaction.com/stylesheets/42cdb3c052/topic.cssLine: 405 Sam  

[Citadel Development] Re: Commit log to refs/heads/master

2010-09-29 Thread samjam
  Wed Sep 29 2010 6:46:48 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Commit log to refs/heads/master hm, maybe the leading / is wrong? /webcit/ should have been entered by the user in advance, and webcit just ignores/keeps it. no doubt, as you say, the leading / is wrong.

[Citadel Development] Re: Git?

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Mon Aug 30 2010 1:58:38 pm EDT EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Git? Ok, we're switching to git. I remain ambivalent about the subject, but since it is in high demand I will go with the flow here. My needs are simple ... even CVS worked just fine for me. Our source

[Citadel Development] Re:

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sat Aug 28 2010 10:06:18 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored 15:10  CIA-37: citadel: dothebart * r8892 citadel/ (13 files in 8 dirs): * do typedef the visit struct, remove all those 'struct' statements from all over the source15:11  CIA-37: citadel: dothebart * r8893

[Citadel Development] Re:

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sat Aug 28 2010 10:06:18 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored 15:10  CIA-37: citadel: dothebart * r8892 citadel/ (13 files in 8 dirs): * do typedef the visit struct, remove all those 'struct' statements from all over the source15:11  CIA-37: citadel: dothebart * r8893

[Citadel Development] ./buildpackages breaks git

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
The command ./buildpackages debian will rename the current directory and create a symlink to the old one. This breaks git; "it knows", and some commands like "git blame" then think the files aren't checked in yet (although git diff works). I always thought a build script renaming managed

[Citadel Development] Re: macro strncmp requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Wed Sep 01 2010 6:14:03 am EDT EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Re: macro "strncmp" requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given   Wed Sep 01 2010 6:06:48 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: macro "strncmp" requires 3 arguments, but only 2 gi

[Citadel Development] Re: Unusual SSL behavior, likely bug

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Wed Sep 01 2010 5:39:34 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Unusual SSL behavior, likely bug Scanios, can you re-test with current git trunk? TIA. Mo Aug 30 2010 17:34:25 EDT von dothebart @ Uncensored Betreff: Re: Unusual SSL behavior, likely bug ok, since our SVN

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
Ignore that patch; I have one that fixes all 3 projects - otherwise they fail to build properly with symlink loops and the like

[Citadel Development] What happened to c_port_number?

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
c_port_number is used in ./server_main.c to listen on, but never set anywhere. ./server_main.c listens on port 0 when it runs this line: CtdlRegisterServiceHook(config.c_port_number,So hows that ever supposed to work? It's been suggested that I re-run "setup" but it doesn't seem to know any of

[Citadel Development] Blog rooms

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
AJC, I note that you have just added VIEW_BLOG   = 9,    /* Blog view (not yet implemented) */but I remind you that 9 was used for VIEW_DRAFTS before it was disabled, and many of my uses already have such rooms. I'm just doing fixes for drafts anyway (so I noticed this) - please

[Citadel Development] Re: What happened to c_port_number?

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sat Sep 04 2010 8:54:39 am EDT EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Re: What happened to c_port_number? Nope, still broken - re-installing the (new) debs, breaks it again and knocks the config back again setup -q is the culprit, after "setup" my ip address is 0.0.0.0, afte

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Mon Sep 06 2010 5:11:39 am EDT EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files   Sun Sep 05 2010 2:24:33 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Re-enable drafts

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sun Sep 05 2010 2:44:51 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Re-enable drafts afair IG disabled it because of it was getting late to get a 7.60 release out; maybe the history of this room of that time shows a more detailed reason. I think some of the concepts

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
The symlink loop occurs when this line is executed: ln -sf libcitadel libcitadel-7.83cd libcitadel-7.83 if libcitadel-7.83 is already a symlink pointing to libcitadel - so the symlink get's made inside libcitadel. The -f option doesn't have the desired effect if the pre-existing symlink target

[Citadel Development] Fw: [PATCH] Fix typo that prevent message summary from working

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
Fix typo that prevent message summary from working --- webcit/static/t/mailsummary_json.html |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)  diff --git a/webcit/static/t/mailsummary_json.html b/webcit/static/t/mailsummary_json.html index 9bf68eb..2e3a749 100644 ---

[Citadel Development] Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
Helps for: ./buildpackes debian src and ./buildpackages sourcedist Also prevent the symlink from being created inside the target if the symlink already exists and points to the target --- citadel/buildpackages| 16 libcitadel/buildpackages | 15 ---

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Mon Sep 06 2010 7:12:03 am EDT EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files The symlink loop occurs when this line is executed: ln -sf libcitadel libcitadel-7.83cd libcitadel-7.83 if libcitadel-7.83 is already

[Citadel Development] others messages

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
citadel still lets a logged in user read messages belonging to any other user. test: login as yourself, and try MSG4 with arbitrary message-numbers. I think Art proposed a fix which would be to cause the MSG* functions to make sure that the requested message was in the current room

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Re-enable drafts

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sun Sep 05 2010 2:44:51 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Re-enable drafts afair IG disabled it because of it was getting late to get a 7.60 release out; maybe the history of this room of that time shows a more detailed reason. I think some of the concepts

[Citadel Development] [PATCH] Allow save-to-drafts without recipients

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
Allow save-to-drafts without recipients --- citadel/msgbase.c |9 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Still need to read X-Citadel-Room when resuming from draftsdiff --git a/citadel/msgbase.c b/citadel/msgbase.c index cd4fd5e..d7f832a 100644 ---

[Citadel Development] Re:

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Mon Sep 06 2010 11:11:50 am EDT EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Ok folks, commit 8f713e8bba92ebb93a9a486d81ec7e966583fd9e in branch stable-78x is the official 7.84 release of all components. tarballs have been built and uploaded. Did you push? Sam

[Citadel Development] Re:

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Wed Sep 08 2010 4:33:02 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored MS-RFC-Violator uses the timestamp when it polled the messages from citadel via imap to show and sort them? WTF? Do you mean that that is how it finds new messages?

[Citadel Development] Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Sun Sep 05 2010 2:24:33 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] Fake the old version number for the paths inside the tar files hm, did you run that script in advance? since its not clever to rename subdirectories (citadel/ to citadel-7.83) in a git workingcopy

[Citadel Development] Sender address broken

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
In nearly git-head of citadel, composing a mail message with webcit doesn't let me choose my identity, doesn't even choose my primary internet email address, but insists on making my from address be user.n...@full.host.name instead of u...@domain.name I ran IGAB command but it made no

[Citadel Development] Edit drafts, was Re: others messages

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Fri Sep 10 2010 11:15:23 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Edit drafts, was Re: others messages Sam, have a look (from this message editing thing i'm just using): input type="hidden" name="force_room" value="Citadel Development" its just posted to the server. If you add an

[Citadel Development] Re: Commit log to refs/heads/master

2010-09-20 Thread samjam
  Tue Sep 14 2010 1:22:03 pm EDT EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Commit log to refs/heads/master How is this information stored on disk? Which information? The id's of messages in rooms. Is it a list or a tree or a hash or a string?

[Citadel Development] Re: Wiki mode yet?

2010-08-27 Thread samjam
  Fri Aug 27 2010 8:41:46 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Wiki mode yet? Fr Aug 27 2010 08:33:51 EDT von samjam @ Uncensored Betreff: Wiki mode yet? Should wiki mode be working yet? (I'm running svn trunk head) Yes, it should be working. There may

[Citadel Development] FIX: Re: BUG: Headers corruption during header folding

2010-08-27 Thread samjam
  Fri Aug 27 2010 6:35:44 am EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: FIX: Re: BUG: Headers corruption during header folding I don't think so; it was introduced very recently - r8886 (git blame helps here) ah, to new for my working copy. 2 lines above where I was looking at ;-)

[Citadel Development] NNTP?

2009-10-16 Thread samjam
In 2006 there was discussion on NNTP support in citadel, as if it worked, but there is no NNTP now it seems. Whats the current status and view of NNTP support? Sam

[Citadel Development] Implicit Rooms for Webcit

2009-10-14 Thread samjam
I know the history of citadel such that it makes historical sense for the current room to not be part of the webcit URL. But it doesn't make sense from a web point of view; I really think the current room should be part of the URL. It also causes trouble for users who have more than one

[Citadel Development] Re: (no subject)

2009-10-09 Thread samjam
* IGnatius T Foobar wrote, On 06/10/09 15:25: Why does wiki have to refer to byzantine markup syntax ?? I think the nature of a wiki isn't that it requires its maintainers to learn wiki markup, but that it can be maintained and edited from within itself. I suppose we can solicit a few

[Citadel Development] Re: evolution and namespaces

2009-07-27 Thread samjam
  Mon Jul 27 2009 10:16:50 am EDT EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: evolution and namespaces And it looks like they've already marked it as a dupe. Evolution's failure to behave properly with namespaces is a colossal failure on their part. They should either

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7647

2009-07-03 Thread samjam
  Fri Jul 03 2009 1:27:48 am EDT EDT from ajc a...@uncensored.citadel.org Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7647 * Temporarily disabled the 'Drafts' functions. I like the idea, but it doesn't work, and I'd like to shuffle some things around. But in the meantime, we need to get 7.60

[Citadel Development] (no subject)

2009-06-19 Thread samjam
  Thu Jun 18 2009 11:34:35 pm EDT EDT from asdfg @ Uncensored I've been noticing on the text client a character sequence shows up in many messages including in the previous message before the word Weird. It looks like IBM characters hex C2 A0. thanks, asdfg

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7575

2009-06-16 Thread samjam
  Sun Jun 14 2009 2:00:41 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7575 Sam, when fixing bugs that also should be fixed in other branches, could you please commit these separately? When I did my git-svn I only got the trunk,

[Citadel Development] Allow to post messgahe in Drafts in mailbox view

2009-06-16 Thread samjam
  Sun Jun 14 2009 2:14:12 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Allow to post messgahe in Drafts in mailbox view Sa Jun 13 2009 09:01:57 EDT von samjam @ Uncensored Betreff: Allow to post messgahe in Drafts in mailbox view ... I added a new room-view

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7581

2009-06-16 Thread samjam
  Sun Jun 14 2009 5:09:43 pm EDT EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7581 sam, I think its better done that way. if there are any objections to using force_room, raise your voice. raise raise the draft saved isn't always a mail message

[Citadel Development] Allow to post messgahe in Drafts in mailbox view

2009-06-13 Thread samjam
Dothebart, you probably want this patch: http://repo.or.cz/w/citadel.git?a=commit;h=67b387e587b4acdf04542acdeb03695bc0b 1c216 Which allows one to post messages into Drafts without recipients, regardless of view mode or anything else.   The second and third patches here may be of interest:

[Citadel Development] Re: [PATCH] In search filters, let empty headers match missing message headers

2009-06-12 Thread samjam
* dothebart wrote, On 12/06/09 08:06: Sam I'll apply it for now. Though i'm not shure whether this is correct. I think having another *0==NULL should continue comparing rather than aborting the search as success. (so do continue instead of return in your patch) IGnatiusTFoobar should

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7566

2009-06-12 Thread samjam
  Fri Jun 12 2009 05:11:08 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7566 Sam, some hints here. [deleted] thanks for the tips I didn't test the drafts stuff so far, please re-check whether my additions did the job, and whether imap

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7566

2009-06-12 Thread samjam
* dothebart wrote, On 12/06/09 14:00: ups. the save to drafts already trapped me. and it posted to the room instead of Drafts. Probably the goto _DRAFTS_ failed (if citadel supporting _DRAFTS_ wasn't updated, or if you don't have a Drafts folder) and the != 2 type meant that the goto failure

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7566

2009-06-12 Thread samjam
* dothebart wrote, On 12/06/09 13:57: Fri Jun 12 2009 14:25:20 CEST from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7566 Fri Jun 12 2009 05:11:08 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7566 Sam

[Citadel Development] Save to drafts

2009-06-11 Thread samjam
  Wed Jun 10 2009 4:23:43 pm EDT EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: Save to drafts unexpected end of message (1) Something wrong with citadel here I think... IMAP shows the message OK, but the message did NOT make it into my sent-items folder it seems, further more

[Citadel Development] save-to-drafts attempt 3

2009-06-11 Thread samjam
The text that keeps getting cut of in the save-to-drafts message is now posted here without the attachment. Althought he message posts and displays fine in imap it won't show in sent-items (even in imap). Here's a draft attempt at a save-to-drafts button:

[Citadel Development] citadel loaded?

2009-06-11 Thread samjam
My yesterdays message which was showing as: unexpected end of message (1) and todays first re-post showing the same, are now showing as normal. I wonder if this is another form of the NOT FOUND bug which I get when I try to post to uncensored sometimes lately. I also notice on my own

[Citadel Development] save-to-drafts better patch

2009-06-11 Thread samjam
Sorry, the patch I posted was the wrong one; I forgot to stg refresh some rework before git format-patch. Please consider this patch before I write the resume-from-drafts code. Sam  From 8dbc0708b926f0747b73691d85c069a42d173dba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Liddicott

[Citadel Development] save-to-drafts better patch

2009-06-11 Thread samjam
  Thu Jun 11 2009 04:35:46 PM EDT from samjam @ Uncensored Subject: save-to-drafts better patch Sorry, the patch I posted was the wrong one; I forgot to stg refresh some rework before git format-patch. Please consider this patch before I write the resume-from-drafts code. Sam

[Citadel Development] [PATCH] Increase MAX_RULES to 50

2009-06-09 Thread samjam
25 is too small for me, maybe for others too Signed-off-by: Sam Liddicott s...@liddicott.com --- webcit/sieve.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/webcit/sieve.c b/webcit/sieve.c index ee94498..891b8ef 100644 --- a/webcit/sieve.c +++ b/webcit/sieve.c @@ -5,7

[Citadel Development] [PATCH] In search filters, let empty headers match missing message headers

2009-06-09 Thread samjam
I've been running this for a while without problems. search for: wefw| would match messages without a References header as well as messages with a blank References header Signed-off-by: Sam Liddicott s...@liddicott.com --- citadel/msgbase.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0

[Citadel Development] static / static.local override

2009-06-09 Thread samjam
Should static/webcit.css be included if static.local/webcit.css exists and is included? The combination of both being included (at different places) was causing my left-col menu to vanish until I deleted static.local/webcit.css   See: link href=static/webcit.css rel=stylesheet

[Citadel Development] [PATCH] Use RFC3676 4.3 signature separator

2009-06-09 Thread samjam
DASH DASH SP is the conventional signature separator, so adding nbsp; Signed-off-by: Sam Liddicott s...@liddicott.com --- webcit/static/t/edit_message.html |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/webcit/static/t/edit_message.html

[Citadel Development] ajax_ stuff in SVN head

2009-06-09 Thread samjam
Latest SVN breaks ajax stuff with apache reverse proxy, including the chat, because the urls are /ajax* without the webcit My fix was to add this to my proxy configuration: RewriteRule ^/(ajax.*) /webcit/$1 [R,L] Generally I think that the /webcit prefix ought to be a site configurable

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7514

2009-06-03 Thread samjam
  Sun May 31 2009 03:33:48 PM EDT from ajc a...@uncensored.citadel.org Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7514 r7514 | ajc | 2009-05-31 15:33:47 -0400 (Sun, 31 May 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7514

2009-06-03 Thread samjam
I think this is great - thank-you. How about webcit representations of who can receive this? Sam Heh - I didn't mean hurry up and do it I meant, any ideas on how it could be portayed? Sam

[Citadel Development] inline messages broken

2009-06-03 Thread samjam
dothebart, this is one of yours: * BIG rewrite of header handling and slimming of context_loop and session_loop; shuffle everything arround. git-svn-id: svn://uncensored.citadel.org/tr...@7459 c9418f8e-8c02-0410-9258-ad310909226a notably, in the mimepart function: +   msgnum =

[Citadel Development] sync kolab Citadel commit log: revision 7451

2009-05-14 Thread samjam
Tue May 12 2009 5:18:53 pm EDT EDT from ajc a...@uncensored.citadel.org Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7451 r7451 | ajc | 2009-05-12 17:18:53 -0400 (Tue, 12 May 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M

[Citadel Development] Threading and EUID

2009-05-03 Thread samjam
I've mentioned that the php blog mode can server up messages based on the message-id header - which is nice, as this is based on the old URL for messages imported from Wordpress. However I also want to respect the old Supercedes header as well, so when threading messages, I will look for a

[Citadel Development] ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-05-01 Thread samjam
I had a patch accepted into socat 1.7 next release so that this command: socat TCP-CONNECT:localhost:504 UNIX-LISTEN:/tmp/citadel-session-h28dae6f,fork,fork-limit=1 Can be used instead of sessionproxy.php, so that php clients can connect and re-connect to a unix socket and get the same citadel

[Citadel Development] ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-05-01 Thread samjam
I've got a git tree here of socat: http://repo.or.cz/w/socat/sam.git The top two patches allow me to use socat to cache a session on a unix socket, like this: /usr/local/bin/socat TCP-CONNECT:localhost:504 UNIX-LISTEN:/tmp/CtdlSession.49fb541f2456a.socket,backlog=5,fork,fork-limit=1,

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7384

2009-04-21 Thread samjam
Tue Apr 21 2009 2:34:57 am EDT from dothebart Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7384 there are two possible causes: * StrBufReadBLOBBuffered() is fed by the wrong size to read by wrong calculation * StrBufReadBLOBBuffered() is trying to continue to read, while the other

[Citadel Development] GetMetaData and mime type

2009-04-18 Thread samjam
As I've mentioned before, Pocket Outlook IMAP believes the minimal header set returned by citadel without the mime-type header, and then shows naked html email messages which makes citadel mostly useless for Pocket Outlook. I was just about to ask if we can have a new top level citadel header

[Citadel Development] Re: ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-04-17 Thread samjam
Sat Apr 11 2009 5:01:15 pm EDT from samjam Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree Fri Mar 27 2009 14:59:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree I'm using ctdlphp to write a blog front-end that exposes public foldersand shows messages that start

[Citadel Development] Re: ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-04-17 Thread samjam
Fri Apr 17 2009 8:51:59 am EDT from samjam Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree Sat Apr 11 2009 5:01:15 pm EDT from samjam Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree Fri Mar 27 2009 14:59:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree I'm using ctdlphp

[Citadel Development] Re: ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-04-17 Thread samjam
Fri Apr 17 2009 1:15:32 pm EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree samjam: I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're asking to do I'm trying to find a MSGS template to select messages without a references header which count as top-level blog

[Citadel Development] Re: ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-04-17 Thread samjam
Fri Apr 17 2009 3:16:21 pm EDT from samjam Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree Fri Apr 17 2009 1:15:32 pm EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree samjam: I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're asking to do. I'm trying to find

[Citadel Development] Re: ctdlphp +, git tree

2009-04-11 Thread samjam
Fri Mar 27 2009 14:59:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: ctdlphp +, git tree I'm using ctdlphp to write a blog front-end that exposes public foldersand shows messages that start a thread as blog posts (full html with embedded images etc) and threaded replies as

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7283

2009-04-03 Thread samjam
Thu Apr 02 2009 12:48:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7283 Ok, there it is ... you should be able to switch back to DLAT now. Thanks - my work-around was faulty anyway, I think it would have failed to recognize when DLAT worked...

[Citadel Development] DLAT missing extra details

2009-04-01 Thread samjam
As per this patch for ctdlphp (don't apply yet) latest citadel DLAT command seems to miss out the mime type and filename, so I'm having to use OPNA CLOS in order to get this. http://repo.or.cz/w/citadel.git?a=commit;h=47a4df71643577bbcc1b8f5bd7240e9e438 ed352 In other news my blog mode now

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7278

2009-03-30 Thread samjam
It hung because citadel server crashed! - at least according to the messages in my Aide room. No core was generated (although I had cores generated on crashes a few weeks ago and I did nothing to turn them off); so I turned core dumps on again and I'll get some backtraces I hope. Sam Sat

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7278

2009-03-28 Thread samjam
Sat Mar 28 2009 06:28:19 EDT from dothebart Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 7278 sam, this should make your xmpp faq run without stunnel; could you please re-validate this? IG, i've hopefuly addressed all revision levels neccessary for protocol/config updates? i've put 744 in

[Citadel Development] Hateful ctdlphp/myinfo.php

2009-03-26 Thread samjam
I've just been playing with ctdlphp, and attach the patch I had to apply to SVN to make it work so far, but here's a warning - myinfo.php totally trashed my vcard and about 30 email aliases I had along with it! I mention this merely as a warning to other people who play with it - don't use a

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7261

2009-03-25 Thread samjam
Tue Mar 24 2009 23:48:27 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 7261 Oh, and in case anyone was wondering: the XML exported by this module will be well-formed but not valid. In what ways do you anticipate it being invalid xml that an ?xml

[Citadel Development] thanks

2009-01-29 Thread samjam
I've just been doing a git-svn clone, and seen so many commits go by that I wanted to say thankyou to the guys who made those commits and brought us citadel. Thanks guys. Sam

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 6989

2009-01-26 Thread samjam
Sun Jan 25 2009 01:07:43 EST from IGnatius T foo...@uncnsrd Subject: Re: Citadel commit log: revision 6989 Ok, so multipart/related images are working now. QUESTION: the links generated by multipart/related always contain the '/webcit' prefix. Is this acceptable? I didn't remove them

[Citadel Development] reply-quoted broken?

2009-01-26 Thread samjam
In my very recdent svn build, reply quoted constructs the recipient address wrongly. If the original from header was of the form:From: Full Name n...@example.comthen the recipient becomes; Full Name regular (non-quoted) reply works fine. Sam

[Citadel Development] Re: bulk delete/move

2009-01-26 Thread samjam
Sat Jan 24 2009 15:32:39 EST from dotheb...@uncnsrd Subject: Re: bulk delete/move the del key on your keyboard.. Thanks. Which key should be used to move the selected messages to another folder? Sam

[Citadel Development] Re: bulk delete/move

2009-01-26 Thread samjam
Mon Jan 26 2009 18:32:55 EST from dotheb...@uncnsrd Subject: Re: bulk delete/move switch your iconbar to a roomlist, expand it to your target folder, and drag+drop them over. maybe once matt is at it, something like the average cut'n' paste would be good for our new thang? Thats pretty

[Citadel Development] js syntax error

2009-01-26 Thread samjam
If I click write mail while the mail folder list view is loading,then I get a syntax error popup dialog.

[Citadel Development] Re: bulk delete/move

2009-01-24 Thread samjam
dothebart wrote: http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/faq:everydayuse:webcit this is the current behavour, intended to become the behavour of SVN Head again. if you start your operation with shift pressed, the mail isn't displayed. I use it for exactly the same purposes. How do you delete the

[Citadel Development] Re: bulk delete/move

2009-01-23 Thread samjam
* IGnatius T Foobar wrote, On 22/01/09 14:17: so that they can do a bulk move or bulk delete without having to read the message. (This means that clicking the checkbox will not select the message). Not likely to happen; the current implementation is designed to act more like

[Citadel Development] bulk delete/move

2009-01-22 Thread samjam
Users have asked for a check-box by each message in the message index, so that they can do a bulk move or bulk delete without having to read the message. (This means that clicking the checkbox will not select the message). Sam

[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 6973

2009-01-22 Thread samjam
* ajc wrote, On 21/01/09 03:13: r6973 | ajc | 2009-01-20 22:13:44 -0500 (Tue, 20 Jan 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/webcit/static/webcit.css * Reduced mailbox_summary font size down to 8pt, looks real nice now

  1   2   >