I tried it out, and while it looks like certain aspects are working quite
well, there are some issues with rooms loading when logged in vs not logged
in through Firefox and Opera.
I have not looked at the backend implementation yet.
> Thu Feb 23 2017 09:49:05 AM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @
So far it's working pretty well. I used the guide at
http://youmightnotneedjquery.com/
to figure out how to do things without jQuery. Now maybe I've done something
horrible, because I've only tested so far on Chrome, but we'll see.
The inspiration was of course the fact that W3CSS doesn't u
That is great. I think these days people are way too dependent on jQuery and
the like when often times it can be done easier.
> Mon Feb 20 2017 09:11:30 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
>Subject: Re: Choosing the right framework
>
>
>Update on that:
>
>I did it. No more jQuery.
Hey the_mgt , check out the current code in the webcit-ng branch ... I have
*roughly* fit in one of the W3CSS templates. Looks promising but it needs
some tweaking (which you can probably do better than I can).
Update on that:
I did it. No more jQuery.
There wasn't a thing in there that couldn't be done a lot easier by simply
making calls to getElementById() and XMLHttpRequest() directly.
I also noticed that the w3css framework is "pure CSS no javascript". Well
not quite, the framework is defined in 100% pure CSS but you still need to
use javascript, for example, to invoke and hide a modal.
But the interesting thing is that, unlike pretty much every other framework
out there,
>Also, What do you think about multiple auth? Internal (able to be disabled,
>but always on by default) plus optionally host based,and optionally LDAP
(or
>AD, not both). If the user database / mail table was able to parse a list
of
You know what, we actually used to do that. Mixed-mo
Bah, I hate when I make a typo... Compiled successfully
> Mon Feb 13 2017 15:08:35 EST from bennabiy @ Uncensored Subject: Re:
>Choosing the right framework
>
>
>
>All fine and wonderful... I guess libraries help ;)
>>
>>
>>/citadel/webcit# make
>>
>>gcc -c -ggdb http.c -o h
All fine and wonderful... I guess libraries help ;)
>
>
>/citadel/webcit# make
>
>gcc -c -ggdb http.c -o http.o
>
>In file included from http.c:15:0:
>
>webcit.h:34:24: fatal error: libcitadel.h: No such file or directory
>
> #include
>
> ^
>
>compilation ter
Great. I will check it out. What is the current state of ctdlsh? I am
considering the administration abstraction from the UI. If the API docs for
citserver and webcit could be reworked to reflect the current state, we might
be able to get a working Admin console for both. I am thinking of webmin an
>If I wanted to fire up webcit-ng, is it in the place where I would be able
to
>compile and test it out? If so, and since you removed the automake stuff,
>what is the recommended method for compiling now?
Very easy. :)
1. git checkout webcit-ng
2. cd webcit
3. make
4. ./w
If I wanted to fire up webcit-ng, is it in the place where I would be able to
compile and test it out? If so, and since you removed the automake stuff,
what is the recommended method for compiling now?
> Mon Feb 13 2017 10:16:43 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject:
>Re: Choosing the
Point 1. is fulfilled by almost all frameworks. Point 2. by almost none, at least not in the basic use case scenario. Wether point 3. is fulfilled by any of the larger frameworks, I do not know. We need to apply the KISS principle here, Citadel in general is about small footprints on the resou
Sun Feb 12 2017 18:07:32 ESTfrom IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Choosing the right framework
I understand IG's wish to choose something wide spread and well supported, so that it stays with us and our slow web-technique adaption cycle. But we also need something that both progr
I understand IG's wish to choose something wide spread and well supported, so that it stays with us and our slow web-technique adaption cycle. But we also need something that both programmers and web designers (or rather the guy that patches the html together) can understand fast. That is why I
That looks nice and simple. I agree, XHTML is not fun to work with.
> Sun Feb 12 2017 11:16:44 EST from the_mgt @ Uncensored Subject: Choosing
>the right framework
>
>
>
>So I was in the mood for some webdesign this weekend and searched again for
>the proper tool to use.
>
>I already had
16 matches
Mail list logo
