On 4/5/07, Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance of these features being pushed back into rose?
The first thing you're likely to see is support for triggers on save,
insert, update, and delete because overriding some of those
correctly (handling transactions and so on) takes some
On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:01 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
On 4/5/07, Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance of these features being pushed back into rose?
The first thing you're likely to see is support for triggers on save,
insert, update, and delete because overriding some of those
--- Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, Let me clarify:
Ovid - you have the seed of this readonly class... john mentioned
what needs to happen for it to get rolled into rose. any chance
that might happen?
I can give you a definite possibility of a firm maybe. I
On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Ovid wrote:
On a side note, the code you posted for making things 'read only'
seemed a bit complicated for me. I simply do something similar to
this:
package My::DataCentre;
use base 'My::Rose::DB::Object';
sub meta_class {
