On 10/7/05 10:30 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote:
> Allow the name of the relation too. For the pod example this would be
> 'prices' because: Product---(prices)-->Price. (Unfortunately the Price
> table is 'prices' too, so this is a bad example.) But by allowing this
> the user could completely leave out the
On 10/7/05 10:30 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote:
>> ARRAYREF should be a reference to an array of table names or "tN" table
>> aliases.
>
> Btw. this morning I had the following idea:
>
> Allow the name of the relation too. For the pod example this would be
> 'prices' because: Product---(prices)-->Price.
BTW, I put the new "distinct" and "fetch_only" manager parameters in CVS
last night. They'll probably go out in the next release, assuming no big
problems are discovered.
Good. Unfortunately I have no time to test this before the weekend. But
if the release can wait until Monday...
ARRAYRE
BTW, I put the new "distinct" and "fetch_only" manager parameters in CVS
last night. They'll probably go out in the next release, assuming no big
problems are discovered.
Here are the docs (from Rose::DB::Object::Manager):
---
=item C
If set to any kind of true value, then the "DISTINCT" SQL k
