On 10/19/05 10:10 PM, Terrence Brannon wrote:
> Well, anyone considering a migration from Class::DBI would want the type of
> functionality it offers for custom SQL. That's why I watch this list and
> actively try out your module. I like what I've seen so far, but was just
> asking about custom sql
On 10/19/05, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/19/05 6:57 PM, Terrence Brannon wrote:> So far Rose is looking nice. What options will there be for using custom> SQL?All I've got planned so far are Manager methods for objects_from_sql() and
objects_from_sth() (which objects_from_sql() w
On 10/19/05 6:57 PM, Terrence Brannon wrote:
> So far Rose is looking nice. What options will there be for using custom
> SQL?
All I've got planned so far are Manager methods for objects_from_sql() and
objects_from_sth() (which objects_from_sql() will call, unsurprisingly).
I'm not even sure if t
So far Rose is looking nice. What options will there be for using custom SQL?
On 10/18/05, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So while you can reduce, say, the vendor class to this:
>
> package My::Vendor;
> use base 'My::Object';
> __PACKAGE__->meta->auto_initialize;
>
> and it works fine, once you start stripping down the classes that participate
> in t
