al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
McGrath
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 9:28 PM
To: Rose::DB::Object list
Subject: Re: [RDBO] Oracle progress
John,
Sorry for the delayed reply, this sounds great. I'll check out the
latest svn from sf.net to
John,
Sorry for the delayed reply, this sounds great. I'll check out the
latest svn from sf.net tomorrow and give it a go. Thanks again for
looking into making these additions.
Also, I will be switching from Cable to FiOS (FINALLY) in the next
couple weeks. I don't anticipate mu
On 12/27/06 3:22 PM, Kevin McGrath wrote:
> Just wondering if there is a time line for some of these Oracle changes to
> be implemented? The sequence addition would be very nice to have. I have a
> kludge right now where I override the save function.
This is pretty much working in SVN. No docs
On 12/27/06 3:22 PM, Kevin McGrath wrote:
> Just wondering if there is a time line for some of these Oracle changes to
> be implemented? The sequence addition would be very nice to have. I have a
> kludge right now where I override the save function.
The next release will probably have simple se
] On Behalf Of John
Siracusa
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 5:20 PM
To: Rose::DB::Object list
Subject: Re: [RDBO] Oracle progress
On 12/6/06, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be OK with an abort from RDBO if I use 'serial' without the
> right sequence s
On 12/6/06, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be OK with an abort from RDBO if I use 'serial' without the
> right sequence setup. But RDBO should allow an override of the
> '%s_seq' name.
No worries. It already does.
-John
---
On 6 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/6/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/6/06 12:44 AM,
Clayton Scott wrote:
>>> 2. create a sequence called _seq
>>
>> That's the crux of it. It looks like I'll have to just pick a naming scheme
>> and say, "If you deviate from this,
On 12/6/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/6/06 12:44 AM, Clayton Scott wrote:
> > 2. create a sequence called _seq
>
> That's the crux of it. It looks like I'll have to just pick a naming scheme
> and say, "If you deviate from this, don't try to use RDBO's 'serial' column
> type
On 12/6/06 12:44 AM, Clayton Scott wrote:
> 2. create a sequence called _seq
That's the crux of it. It looks like I'll have to just pick a naming scheme
and say, "If you deviate from this, don't try to use RDBO's 'serial' column
type with oracle."
> Postgres does the exact same thing for it's SE
On 12/6/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Through judicious commenting-out, I've got RDBO passing 479 of the roughly
> 800 possible Oracle tests in t/db-object-manager.t. Basically, limit/offset
> works as requested by Kevin earlier. To do this, I did the minimum work
> needed to get
Through judicious commenting-out, I've got RDBO passing 479 of the roughly
800 possible Oracle tests in t/db-object-manager.t. Basically, limit/offset
works as requested by Kevin earlier. To do this, I did the minimum work
needed to get t/db-object-manager.t to run at all, which included some qui
11 matches
Mail list logo
