Important fix for a bug that could prevent Manager classes from
loading, plus one other small change.
0.7661 (01.29.2008) - John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fixed method clash detection in Rose::DB::Object::Manager.
* Streamlined caching implementation in Rose::DB::Object::Cached.
On 01/29/2008 12:47 PM, Chris Jacobson wrote:
Hello Rose List!
Is there a way, using Rose::DB::Object::Loader, that the generated
classes can be instructed to include the 'schema' meta value? I took
a peek under the hood, and can't figure out the proper place that a
patch would
Hello Rose List!
Is there a way, using Rose::DB::Object::Loader, that the generated
classes can be instructed to include the 'schema' meta value? I took
a peek under the hood, and can't figure out the proper place that a
patch would have to be applied to add an option such as
On Jan 29, 2008 5:28 PM, Justin Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really a bug, but aren't you now burning extra CPU cycles on line
166 of RDBO::Cached? As far as I can tell, removing the line doesn't
change the logic any.
Whoops, copy-and-paste-o. Fixed in SVN. Maybe I'll release it as
On Jan 29, 2008 9:55 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just a naive guess here, but if you were using DBI-connect_cached as the
underlying connect method, wouldn't DBI handle the sharing for you?
No, I'm pretty sure DBI uses the class as part of the connect_cached key.
-sam
Hey all. I'm getting started with Rose::DB::Object. My problem is I need
to inter-operate with a large pre-existing Class::DBI code-base. I'd like
to setup Rose to be able to share the same DBI connection that Class::DBI
uses - otherwise I'll instantly double the number of connections from our
On Jan 29, 2008 10:06 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The db atribute of an RDBO-derived object isa Rose::DB, but each
Rose::DB-derived object has a DBI $dbh. IOW, plain old DBI database
handles are used via delegation in RDBO. There's no subclassing of
DBI classes at all.
On Jan 29, 2008 9:57 PM, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 9:55 PM, Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just a naive guess here, but if you were using DBI-connect_cached as the
underlying connect method, wouldn't DBI handle the sharing for you?
No, I'm pretty sure DBI
On 1/29/08, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you happen to know if RDBO will tolerate a
DBIx::ContextualFetch based DBI handle?
It should, and if it doesn't, I can probably make it do so with some
minor edits. Give of a try and let me know.
-John
