Re: [RDBO] sorted relationship output?
On 3/14/06 8:12 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: Can you think of a good way to pass custom manager_args to individual calls to a relationship accessor? Maybe a new read-only accessor type where arguments can't possible be meant to set values? Is it possible to make a second accessor for the same relationship, a la products_by_id() versus products_by_name()? Yep, that's fine. (Although you have to be careful not to set values using more than one of these relationships on the same object :) But that's not the same thing as accepting custom sort-by parameters on a per-call basis. -John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] sorted relationship output?
On 14 Mar 2006, John Siracusa wrote:
On 3/14/06 4:17 AM, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
Is it possible to either define a default sort_by clause in the
relationship definition
See Uwe's earlier response for how to do this.
Yes, that works great. Thanks!
or when the relationship method is actually used
($company-products({sort_by = 'name'}) or something
That's not currently possible because a hashref argument to a relationship
accessor method already has a meaning:
At the moment I can do without it because I only need one sort order.
# Set this company's list of products to
# products 123 and 456
$company-products({ id = 123 }, { id = 456 });
# Set this company's vendor to Acme
$company-vendor({ name = 'Acme' });
Can you think of a good way to pass custom manager_args to individual calls
to a relationship accessor? Maybe a new read-only accessor type where
arguments can't possible be meant to set values?
Yes, perhaps, or a second hashref with meta-args.
When I was looking for a solution I always thought: It must be
something like the manager method get_products() and that is read-
only.
But on the other hand perhaps it is better to leave it until you see
a really good solution.
Cheers,
Michael
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
Re: [RDBO] sorted relationship output?
On 14 Mar 2006, Uwe Voelker wrote:
$meta-relationships
(
changes = {type = 'one to many',
class= 'Changes',
column_map = {ID = 'AUFTRAG'},
manager_args = {sort_by = 'CHANGES.DATUM DESC'},
query_args = [KATEGORIE = {ne = ''}],
},
);
You can use manager_args for the ordering.
Thanks, works like a charm!
Cheers,
Michael
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
