On 5/6/21 10:03 AM, David Faure wrote:
On mercredi 21 avril 2021 10:21:13 CEST Philip Leishman wrote:
Yes this mail is an excellent description of the benefits of qCDebug.
Thanks David. I agree with everything.
Actually parallel to this I did a little merge request - also with a
minimal chan
On mercredi 21 avril 2021 10:21:13 CEST Philip Leishman wrote:
> Yes this mail is an excellent description of the benefits of qCDebug.
> Thanks David. I agree with everything.
>
> Actually parallel to this I did a little merge request - also with a
> minimal change to demonstrate category debuggin
On 4/21/21 2:59 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
On 4/21/21 3:44 AM, David Faure wrote:
qDebug/qCDebug can be turned off at compile time with
QT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT, which we could decide to set in release builds.
That is *exactly* what I need. I need the performance hit removed in
release builds. If som
On 4/21/21 3:44 AM, David Faure wrote:
> qDebug/qCDebug can be turned off at compile time with
QT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT, which we could decide to set in release builds.
That is *exactly* what I need. I need the performance hit removed in
release builds. If someone wants debug logging, they can d
Yes this mail is an excellent description of the benefits of qCDebug.
Thanks David. I agree with everything.
Actually parallel to this I did a little merge request - also with a
minimal change to demonstrate category debugging. And (surprise) it
looks almost exactly like the changes here !!
Howe
On lundi 19 avril 2021 02:54:18 CEST Ted Felix wrote:
> On 4/18/21 3:48 PM, Philip Leishman wrote:
> > I still think qCDebug is a good way to go. I just don't know how to do
> > it without changing many hundreds of lines of code in almost all files.
>
>Before we embark on this project, I would
On 4/18/21 3:48 PM, Philip Leishman wrote:
I still think qCDebug is a good way to go. I just don't know how to do
it without changing many hundreds of lines of code in almost all files.
Before we embark on this project, I would like to see a proof of
concept that shows that we can correctly
On dimanche 18 avril 2021 21:48:35 CEST Philip Leishman wrote:
> Yes in that sense it does slot in.
> I was looking for a way to use the existing macro - redefine RG_DEBUG to
> something using qCDebug - this appears to be not so easy.
>
> I still think qCDebug is a good way to go. I just don't know
Yes in that sense it does slot in.
I was looking for a way to use the existing macro - redefine RG_DEBUG to
something using qCDebug - this appears to be not so easy.
I think the category logging is a separate issue to the precompiled
headers - I think we have reached a good status with the prec
