Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Chris Cannam
Here's my go at tidying up the list. Let me know what features (and people!) I've overlooked... Chris - snip - This is a particularly exciting release for the Rosegarden project. It includes a number of interesting new features, many of which we expect to build upon further in future

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Guillaume Laurent
Chris Cannam wrote: Here's my go at tidying up the list. Let me know what features (and people!) I've overlooked... Can we hold on until I finish the fix for the loop rule autoscrolling bug ? Hopefully in the next few days. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 11 Sep 2006 15:10, Guillaume Laurent wrote: Chris Cannam wrote: Here's my go at tidying up the list. Let me know what features (and people!) I've overlooked... Can we hold on until I finish the fix for the loop rule autoscrolling bug ? Hopefully in the next few days. We're not

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Chris Cannam
Also, we need a decision on the fretboard insertion tool. Do we: a. Leave it in, enabled by default, and publicise it in the release note b. Leave it in, enabled by default, but keep quiet about it for now c. Leave it in but make it a compile option disabled by default d. Remove it from

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 11 Sep 2006 17:30, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: I'm not sure on this. Memory says 1.2.3 went out with the new canvas, but actually making it automatically expand was held off until after. 1.2.4 might have gone out with such auto-expansion, but if so, it shouldn't have, because that

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 11 September 2006 10:18 am, Chris Cannam wrote: a. Leave it in, enabled by default, and publicise it in the release note b. Leave it in, enabled by default, but keep quiet about it for now c. Leave it in but make it a compile option disabled by default d. Remove it from this

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday 11 September 2006 12:40 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Damn it, let's call this thing 1.4. Going from 1.2.4 to 1.3 for such a big set of features doesn't feel right, strictly meaningless though the version number may be. Let's make that 1.5, I say. At least. I might even go higher than

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Monday, 11 September 2006 15:53, Chris Cannam wrote: Here's my go at tidying up the list. Let me know what features (and people!) I've overlooked... You have overlooked split segment by recording source. About Lilypond export, it has been enhanced with several new features, as the new

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-11 Thread Stephen Torri
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 15:18 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: Also, we need a decision on the fretboard insertion tool. Do we: a. Leave it in, enabled by default, and publicise it in the release note b. Leave it in, enabled by default, but keep quiet about it for now c. Leave it in but make

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 08 September 2006 3:35 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/rosegarden-1.3pre1.tar.bz2 Why does scons -c install have to hose the built tree too? That's stupid. Now I have to rebuild everything just because I wanted to remove an installed copy temporarily?

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Friday, 8 September 2006 21:35, Chris Cannam wrote: http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/rosegarden-1.3pre1.tar.bz2 It builds and installs OK here. Preliminary tests were successfull, too. Regards, Pedro - Using Tomcat

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 08 September 2006 3:35 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Also seeking contributions for the what's new in 1.3 release note. I'm combing through the log to find where new-to-1.3 stuff starts, and will produce something directly. -- D. Michael McIntyre Linux fanatic, and certified Geek;

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Friday, 8 September 2006 21:35, Chris Cannam wrote: Also seeking contributions for the what's new in 1.3 release note. Here is a list of some new features that I've worked for this release. Some features have several SF tracker items, and some none. RFE# 1004883 Panic function better access

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 08 September 2006 3:35 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: Also seeking contributions for the what's new in 1.3 release note. Here is the raw list. I'm not up for rearranging it into some logical order at the moment. I suggest we should extrapolate highlights into some nice, inviting sounding

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread Martin Shepherd
It looks as though everybody has been very busy while I have been away! I haven't had time to download the changes yet. I see that my addition of the tabbed parameter box has turned out to be very controversial. Oops. I haven't seen how it looks in its current incarnation, but if nobody likes

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] prerelease tarball

2006-09-08 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Friday 08 September 2006 10:01 pm, Martin Shepherd wrote: It looks as though everybody has been very busy while I have been away! I haven't had time to download the changes yet. How was Chile? It has indeed been a long and productive time! I see that my addition of the tabbed parameter